䊏
We have several LEED-certified professionals on staff, which we find is most
important from a marketing point of view. We practiced sustainable design
before LEED existed. We are always mindful of the primary importance of bio-
climatic design; this is mostly ignored by LEED, except in energy measurement.
2000 AIA/COTE Top Ten Winner
HANOVER HOUSE
LOCATION: Hanover, New Hampshire
DESIGN ENGINEER (CONSULTANT): Energysmiths / Marc Rosenbaum, PE
The project was a solar-heated, superinsulated home. Indoor environmental quality,
durability, and material-resource efficiency were as important as low energy con-
sumption. Key features include superinsulation, superglass, heat-recovery ventila-
tion, airtight construction, and passive-solar design. Durable and healthy materials
include certified cedar shingles, linoleum, tile, and local hardwood floors. The house
is extremely comfortable, with even temperatures and proper humidity, and features
a very low-maintenance design as well as low water usage.
Building Performance, According to the Architect
The building’s performance over the past decade has matched the detailed model-
ing that was done during the design process remarkably well. It continues to be one
of the lowest energy-use homes anywhere, despite its cold climate location. One of
the clients is a professional engineer, and as such the client was interested in push-
ing the envelope technically. Also, the clients were quite pleased to not have any
combustion sources or fuel storage in the building.
Lessons Learned by the Architect
䊏
Given the drop in prices of solar electric systems, I would likely use photo-
voltaics and a ground-source heat pump rather than the solar thermal
approach, and then I would use radiant floors as the heat-delivery method.
䊏
High-quality forced-air systems (airtight and fully insulated, with a return in
every closable room) are expensive. Air systems are regarded as low cost only
because they are being built badly.
䊏
I was a very early LEED-accredited professional and worked on the first certi-
fied project in New England. I find LEED to be helpful for large projects where
the architects and engineers are just paying lip service to green design,
because the program imposes a structure with some metrics. On more
advanced projects, where the design team and the owner committed to do a
great job, LEED—with its bureaucracy and minutiae—is an expensive imped-
iment. I’ve been fairly successful in convincing my clients to bypass LEED,
which costs between $50,000 and $75,000 to implement on a small project,
if the time is really accounted for.
2000 AIA/COTE TOP TEN GREEN PROJECTS 165