Назад
88 CHAPTER 4 EFFECTS OF ALLOYING ELEMENTS ON FE–C ALLOYS
Fig. 4.15 Fe–0.75V–0.15C transformed 5 min at 725
C. Interphase precipitation of VC in
ferrite (courtesy of Batte). Thin-foil electron micrograph.
Fig. 4.16 Fe–0.25V–0.05C transformed and held at h at 740
C. VC precipitation on
dislocations (courtesy of Ballinger). Thin-foil electron micrograph.
4.4 STRUCTURAL CHANGES RESULTING FROM ALLOYING ADDITIONS 89
In general, the fibrous morphology represents a closer approach to an equi-
librium structure so it is more predominant in steels which have transformed
slowly. In contrast, the interphase precipitation and dislocation nucleated struc-
tures occur more readily in rapidly transforming steels, where there is a high
driving force, e.g., in microalloyed steels (Chapter 10).
4.4.2 Alloy carbide fibres and laths
The clearest analogy with pearlite is found when the alloy carbide in lath morp-
hology forms nodules in association with ferrite. These pearlitic nodules are
often encountered at temperatures just below Ae
1
in steels which transform
relatively slowly. For example, these structures are obtained in chromium steels
with between 4 and 12 wt% chromium (Fig. 4.11), and the morphology is analo-
gous to that of cementitic pearlite. It is, however, different in detail because of
the different crystal structures of the possible carbides, e.g. Cr
7
C
3
is hexagonal
and Cr
23
C
6
is complex cubic. The structures observed are relatively coarse, but
finer than pearlite formed under equivalent conditions, because of the need for
the partition of the alloying element, e.g. chromium between the carbide and
the ferrite. To achieve this, the interlamellar spacing must be substantially finer
than in the equivalent iron–carbon case.
At lower temperatures the lath morphology is largely replaced by much finer
fibrous aggregates, e.g. in high Cr steels coarse laths of Cr
23
C
6
can be replaced
by fine fibres of the same carbide usually 500 Å in diameter. Their length, which
is determined by the size of the ferrite colony, can be up to 10 µm with little or
no branching. Similar morphologies occur,but are much less dominant, in steels
containing W, Ti, V and Nb.
Carbide fibres are frequently associated with planar interfaces, as well as
with pearlitic-type interfaces. Nevertheless, these are boundaries which can
apparently propagate rapidly without the need for step migration. A computer
analysis of similar boundaries in austenitic steels has shown that they possess
comparatively high densities of coincident lattice sites.
7
4.4.3 Interphase precipitation
Interphase precipitation has been shown to nucleate periodically at the γ/α
interface during the transformation. The precipitate particles form in bands
which are closely parallel to the interface, and which follow the general direction
of the interface even when it changes direction sharply. A further characteristic
is the frequent development of only one of the possibleWidmanstätten variants,
e.g. VC platelets in a particular region are all only of one variant of the habit, i.e.
that in which the plates are most nearly parallel to the interface. The bands are
often associated with planar low-energy interfaces, and the interband spacing
is determined by the height of steps which move along the interface (Fig. 4.17).
90 CHAPTER 4 EFFECTS OF ALLOYING ELEMENTS ON FE–C ALLOYS
Fig. 4.17 Fe–12Cr–0.2C wt% transformed 30 min at 650
C. Precipitation of M
23
C
6
at stepped
γ/α interface: (a) bright field; (b) precipitate spot dark field (courtesy of Campbell). Thin-foil
electron micrograph.
The nucleation of the carbide particles occurs normally on the low energy planar
interfaces, rather than on the rapidly moving high-energy steps.
7
The need for step movement on the γ/α interface is in contrast to the growth
of fibrous carbides behind an interface on which no steps are observed. Indeed if,
in these circumstances, a step does move along the interface, the fibrous growth
is stopped and replaced by interphase precipitation. The step height and, there-
fore, the band spacing of the precipitation, is dependent on the temperature of
transformation and on the composition.As the temperature of transformation is
lowered the band spacing is reduced, e.g. in a 1 wt% V 0.2 wt% carbon steel, the
spacing varies from 25 nm at 825
C to 7.5 nm at 725
C (Fig. 4.18), and at lower
temperatures has been observed to be less than 5 nm. The extremely fine scale
of this phenomenon in vanadium steels, which also occurs in Ti and Nb steels, is
due to the rapid rate at which the γ/α transformation takes place. At the higher
transformation temperatures, the slower rate of reaction leads to coarser struc-
tures. Similarly, if the reaction is slowed down by addition of further alloying
elements, e.g. Ni and Mn, the precipitate dispersion coarsens. The scale of the
dispersion also varies from steel to steel, being coarsest in chromium, tungsten
and molybdenum steels where the reaction is relatively slow, and much finer
in steels in which vanadium, niobium and titanium are the dominant alloying
elements and the transformation is rapid.
7
Ainsley, M. H., Cocks, G. J. and Miller, D. R., Metal Science 13, 20, 1979.
4.5 TRANSFORMATION DIAGRAMS FOR ALLOY STEELS 91
Fig. 4.18 Interphase precipitation of VC in vanadium steels. Precipitate sheet spacing as a
function of transformation temperature (courtesy of Ballinger).
4.4.4 Nucleation in supersaturated ferrite
It has been shown that ferrite can occur in different morphologies depending on
the transformation temperature. At the highest transformation temperatures,
equi-axed boundary allotriomorphs form at the austenite grain boundaries, and
carbon diffuses to the austenite. In alloy steels, e.g. lowV steels,there is evidence
that the alloying element can also partition. As a result no alloy carbide forms in
this ferrite, which is thus truly pro-eutectoid. At lower temperatures the ferrite
formed is still equi-axed, but the alloy carbide forms at the same time either
as interphase precipitate or as fibres. This is probably the closest approach to
true eutectoid behaviour in an alloy steel containing a strong carbide-forming
element.
At still lower transformation temperatures the ferrite adopts a Widmanstät-
ten habit and forms as laths, as in pure iron–carbon alloys. However, this ferrite
can be supersaturated when first formed. If held only for a short time at the
transformation temperature,precipitation of the alloy carbide occurs within the
ferrite on dislocations. Such behaviour would be expected in alloy steels with
acicular ferrite provided a strong carbide former such as V, Ti or Nb is present
although, in theory, similar structures should be possible in plain carbon steels.
4.5 TRANSFORMATION DIAGRAMS FOR ALLOY STEELS
The transformation of austenite below the euctectoid temperature can best be
presented in an isothermal transformation diagram (Chapter 3), in which the
92 CHAPTER 4 EFFECTS OF ALLOYING ELEMENTS ON FE–C ALLOYS
beginning and end of transformation is plotted as a function of temperature
and time. Such curves are known as time–temperature–transformation, or TTT,
curves and form one of the important sources of quantitative information for
the heat treatment of steels. In the simple case of an eutectoid plain carbon
steel, the curve is roughly ‘C’-shaped with the pearlite reaction occurring down
to the nose of the curve and a little beyond. At lower-temperatures bainite and
martensite form (see Chapters 5 and 6). The diagrams become more complex
for hypo- and hyper-eutectoid alloys as the ferrite or cementite reactions have
also to be represented by additional lines.
Alloying elements, on the whole, retard both the pro-eutectoid reactions and
the pearlite reaction, so that TTT curves for alloy steels are moved increasingly
to longer times as the alloy content is increased. Additionally, those elements
which expand the γ-field depress the eutectoid temperature, with the result that
they also depress the position of the TTT curves relative to the temperature
axes. This behaviour is shown by steels containing manganese or nickel. For
example, in a 13Mn–0.8C wt% steel, pearlite can form at temperatures as low as
400 C. In contrast, elements which favour the ferrite phase raise the eutectoid
temperature and theTTT curves move correspondingly to higher temperatures.
The slowing down of the ferrite and pearlite reactions by alloying elements
enables these reactions to be more readily avoided during heat treatment, so
that the much stronger low-temperature phases such as bainite and martensite
can be obtained in the microstructure. The hard martensitic structure is only
obtained in plain carbon steels by water quenching from the austenitic condition
whereas, by the addition of alloying elements, a lower critical cooling rate is
needed to achieve this condition. Consequently, alloy steels allow hardening to
occur during oil quenching, or even on air cooling, if the TTT curve has been
sufficiently displaced to longer times.
FURTHER READING
Andrews, K. W., Metal Treatment 19, 425; 489, 1952; Iron and Steel, March 1961.
Bain, E. C. and Paxton, H. W.,Alloying Elements in Steel,American Society for Metals, Ohio,
USA, 1966.
Bullens, D. K., Steel and Its Heat Treatment, Vols 1 and 2, John Wiley, USA, 1956.
Cerjak, H., Hofer, P. and Schaffernak, B., ISIJ International 39, 874, 1999.
Cottrell, A. H., Chemical Bonding in Transition Metal Carbides, The Institute of Materials,
London, 1995.
De Ardo, A. J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Processing, Microstructure and
Properties of HSLA Steels,TMS-AIME, Pittsburgh, 1987.
Goldschmidt, H. J., Interstitial Alloys, Butterworths, UK, 1967.
Gray,J. M.,Ko,T.,Zhang Shouhwa,Wu Barong andXie Xishan (eds),HSLA Steels: Metallurgy
and Applications,ASM International, Ohio, USA, 1986.
Hillert, M., ISIJ International 30, 559, 1990.
Honeycombe, R. W. K., Ferrite, Hatfield Memorial Lecture, 1979, Metal Science 14,
1980.
FURTHER READING 93
Igarashi, M. and Swaragi, Y. Proceedings of the International Conference on Power
Engineering – 1997, Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers,Tokyo, Japan, p. 107, 1997.
Krauss, G., Steels: Heat Treatment and Processing Principles, ASM International, Ohio, USA,
1990.
Leslie, W. C.,The Physical Metallurgy of Steels, McGraw-Hill, Tokyo, Japan, 1981.
Marden, A. R. and Goldstein (eds) Phase Transformations in Ferrous Alloys, TMS-AIME,
Warrendale, 1984.
Pickering, F. B., Physical Metallurgy and the Design of Steels, Applied Science Publishers,
London, UK, 1978.
Pierson, H. O., Handbook of Refractory Carbides and Nitrides, Noyes Publications, USA,
1996.
This page intentionally left blank
5
FORMATION OF MARTENSITE
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The quenching to room temperature of austenite in a steel can lead to the for-
mation of martensite, a very hard phase in which the carbon, formerly in solid
solution in the austenite, remains in solution in the new phase. Unlike ferrite or
pearlite, martensite forms by a deformation of the austenite lattice without any
diffusion of atoms. The deformation causes a change in the shape of the trans-
formed region, consisting of a large shear and a volume expansion. Martensite
is, therefore, often referred to as a diffusionless, shear transformation, which is
highly crystallographic in character because it is generated by a specific deform-
ation of the austenite. When the formation of martensite is constrained by its
surroundings, it forms as thin plates or laths in order to minimize the strain
energy due to the deformation.
5.2 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS
The martensite reaction in steels normally occurs athermally, i.e. the fraction
transformed depends on the undercooling below a martensite-start temperature,
M
s
. The extent of transformation does not seem to depend on time,as expressed
in the Koistenen and Marburger equation
1
which describes the progress of
transformation below M
s
:
1 V
α
= exp{β(M
s
T
q
)} where β ≃−0.011 (5.1)
V
α
is the fraction of martensite and T
q
the temperature below M
s
, to which
the sample is cooled. This athermal character is a consequence of very rapid
nucleationand growth,sorapid that thetime takencan beneglected. Instead,the
1
Koistinen, D. P. and Marburger, R. E.,Acta Metallurgica 7, 59, 1959.
95
96 CHAPTER 5 FORMATION OF MARTENSITE
Table 5.1 The temperature M
s
at which martensite first
forms on cooling, and the approximate Vickers hardness of
the resulting martensite for a number of materials
Composition M
s
/K Hardness HV
ZrO
2
1200 1000
Fe–31Ni–0.23C wt% 83 300
Fe–34Ni–0.22C wt% <4 250
Fe–3Mn–2Si–0.4C wt% 493 600
Cu–15Al 253 200
Ar–40N
2
30
fraction transformed depends only on the number of nucleation sites triggered,
with the less potent sites contributing at higher undercoolings.
From Equation (5.1) it is evident that someaustenite remains untransformed
when T
q
is set to room temperature. This is referred to as retained austenite.
It is also clear that there is no martensite-finish temperature, M
f
but for conve-
nience, the latter is frequently defined at the point where 95% of the martensitic
transformation is completed.
Martensite is not restricted to steels although its technological importance
in steels is unsurpassed. Table 5.1 lists a variety of materials which exhibit
martensitic transformation,together with M
s
temperatures and hardness values.
To obtain martensite, it is usually necessary for the steel to be cooled from
the austenite phase field at a rate which is sufficiently fast to avoid all other
solid-state transformations such as ferrite and pearlite. This cooling rate can
be very high for plain carbon steels but quite slow for a heavily alloyed steel
containing large concentrations of austenite stabilizing solutes.
Martensite can form at very low temperatures, where diffusion, even of
interstitial atoms, is not conceivable over the time period of the experiment.
Table 5.1 gives typical values of the martensite-start temperature for a variety
of materials. Martensite plates can grow at speeds which are a significant frac-
tion of the speed of sound in the steel, some 1100 m s
1
. Such a high rate of
growth is inconsistent with diffusion during transformation. Transformations
which involve diffusion are much slower the fastest recorded solidification
rate is about 80 m s
1
in pure nickel. The chemical composition of martensite
can be measured and shown to be identical to that of the parent austenite.
These observations demonstrate convincingly that martensitic transformations
are diffusionless.
5.2.1 The habit plane
The habit refers to the interface plane between austenite and martensite as mea-
sured on a macroscopic scale (Fig. 5.1). For unconstrained transformations this
5.2 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS 97
Fig. 5.1 An illustration of the habit plane between austenite (γ) and martensite (α
).
Table 5.2 Habit plane indices for martensite. With the exception of
ǫ-martensite, the quoted indices are approximate because the habit planes
are in general irrational (the square root of 2 is not a rational number)
Composition/wt% Approximate habit plane indices
Low-alloy steels, Fe–28Ni {111}
γ
Plate martensite in Fe–1.8C {295}
γ
Fe–30Ni–0.3C {31510}
γ
Fe–8Cr–1C {252}
γ
ǫ-martensite in 18/8 stainless steel {111}
γ
interface plane is flat, but the need to minimize strains introduces some curva-
ture when the transformation is constrained by its surroundings. Nevertheless,
the macroscopic habit plane is identical for both cases, as illustrated in Fig. 5.1.
Steels of vastly different chemical composition can have martensite with
the same habit plane (Table 5.2), and indeed, other identical crystallographic
characteristics.
5.2.2 Orientation relationships
The formation of martensite involves the coordinated movement of atoms. It
follows that the austenite and martensite lattices will be intimately related. All
martensitic transformations therefore lead to a reproducible orientation rela-
tionship between the parent and product lattices. It is frequently the case that
a pair of corresponding close-packed
2
planes in the ferrite and austenite are
2
The body-centred cubic lattice does not have a close-packed plane but {011}
α
is the most
densely packed plane.