inaccessible. Typical values of the specific surface area measured by the BET tech-
nique range from 20 to 85 m
2
/g (del Arco et al., 1994). For Mg–Al LDH containing
simple anions such as carbonate, chloride, and nitrate, the surface area is mostly less
than 100 m
2
/g ( Pesic et al., 1992; Di Cosimo et al., 1998; Hussein et al., 2001; Inacio
et al., 2001). Hydrothermal crystallization decreases the surface area (Labajos et al.,
1992). Synthesis by coprecipitation in mixed solutions of water and organic solvents
increases the surface area (Malherbe et al., 1997; Inacio et al., 2001).
Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms (type II with a narrow hysteresis) in-
dicate that LDH-containing simple anions are mesoporous with no microporosity
even when large POM pillars are intercalated (Labajos et al., 1992; Pesic et al., 1992;
Inacio et al., 2001). However, [Mg–Al] LDH intercalated by [Fe(CN)
6
] complexes
have an exceptionally high specific surface area of 499 m
2
/g (Nijs et al., 1999) and a
narrow pore size distribution with the majority of pores o0.71 nm. A correlation is
found between the Mg
2+
/Al
3+
ratio and the resulting microporosity after pillaring.
The optimal ratio is about 3.3, resulting in a pillared [Fe(CN)6]–MgA l–LDH with a
specific Langmuir surface area of 499 m
2
/g and a micr opore volume between 0.158
and 0.177 mL/g.
13.1.7. FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES
A. Chemical Stability
Chemical stability is of importance to many practical applications in which LDH
feature. For example, this parameter needs to be assessed when LDH are used as a
sink of radioactive metal ions from nuclear waste repositories (Allda et al., 2002). In
geochemical assessments, the stability of LDH is evaluated in terms of its solubility
in water (Ford et al., 1999; Scheckel et al., 2000). Solubility data for metal hydrox-
ides and LDH were derived from pH titration (Boclair and Braterman, 1998, 1999;
Boclair et al., 1999). The stability of LDH increases in the order Mg
2+
oMn
2+
o
Co
2+
E Ni
2+
oZn
2+
for divalent cations, and Al
3+
oFe
3+
for trivalent cations
(Boclair and Braterman, 1999). This trend accords with the pK
sp
values of the cor-
responding metal hydroxides (K
sp
is the solubility product). Because the pK
sp
of
Mg(OH)
2
is smaller than that of Zn(OH)
2
, Mg-based LDH are more soluble. Thus,
the aqueous solution of a Mg-based LDH is more basic than the corresponding
aqueous solution of a Zn-based LDH. Saturated aqueous solutions of Mg–Al–Cl
LDH and Zn–Al–Cl LDH, deaerated with Ar, have pH values of 8.91 and 6.97,
respectively (Shaw et al., 1990).
In addition to direct measurements of solubi lity, Allda et al. (2002) calculated the
aqueous solubility of an LDH from therm ochemical data. The heat of formation and
the free energy of formation of the carbonate form of an LDH are equal to
the values for a physical mixture of the binary compounds, i.e., the metal hydroxides
and carbonates. Their simple physical mixture model indicates that the aqueous
13.1.7. Fundamental Properties 1049