366 THE LATE MIDDLE AGES
The Church had an uneasy relationship with the epidemic of divine revelation.
It certainly validated the notion of God’s ability to make Himself known to whom-
ever He wished, and it certainly urged all believers to pursue a relationship with
Him; but at the same time the Church remained suspicious of such wide-ranging
claims of divine contact. It is one thing to accept the idea that God could appear
to anyone anywhere and at any time if He so chose to do; it is quite another to
accept that the person sitting next to you in a crowded tavern is seeing God and
hearing His voice at that very moment (especially if he or she starts behaving like
Margery Kempe). Most mystics, therefore, were carefully watched and tended to
by a member of the clergy who heard their confessions, listened to their descrip-
tions of their revelations, and frequently wrote those revelations down—some-
times in bowdlerized form—for episcopal or even papal review. Thus a large body
of mystical literature survives. Moreover, recognized mystics acquired great influ-
ence in society and within the Church. A woman like St. Catherine of Siena (1347–
1380), the daughter of a wool dyer and his wife (who bore an astounding twenty-
five children, Catherine being the twenty-fourth), received visitors and letters from
across Europe, asking her advice on spiritual and moral questions. Catherine,
moreover, fearlessly addressed popes, kings, queens, and urban leaders and cas-
tigated them for failing to live up to their Christian responsibilities. Nearly four
hundred of her letters survive.
If the surviving literature is representative, mystical revelation seems to have
occurred more to women than to men in the High and Late Middle Ages. It may
be that female mystics were regarded with greater suspicion than male ones, and
hence the written record of their revelations is more abundant; but it is also likely
that mysticism, by virtue of its non-intellectual (and in many cases anti-
intellectual) nature, simply was in greater accord with female religious experience
in the Middle Ages—that it represented, in other words, an intensified version of
a type of spirituality that had always belonged to women. The fact that Church
tradition left women with fewer options for fulfilling a religious calling also is
likely to have played a role. The thirteenth and fourteenth centuries provide a roll
call of women whose ecstatic experiences gave them considerable influence over
social and religious life: Marie d’Oignies (d. 1213) is traditionally regarded as the
foundress of the beguine movement; Juliana of Mont-Cornillon (d. 1258) began
the popular call for an official Feast of Corpus Christi, which the Church initiated
in 1247; Hadewijch of Flanders (d. ca. 1245) described her visions in a long series
of poems, letters, and narratives that utilized the vocabulary of courtly love to
reflect upon her “mystical marriage” or “mystical bridal-union” with Christ;
Bridget of Sweden (d. 1372) used her mystical authority to criticize the Holy See
itself for its shortcomings, doing so even while residing at the papal court; Cath-
erine of Siena (d. 1380) followed in Bridget’s path and publicly railed against the
“stench of corruption” that surrounded the papacy; Julian of Norwich (d. 1420)
wrote the Revelations of Divine Love, perhaps the most moving of mystical memoirs,
and became a cult figure; Margery Kempe, also of England, offered a minutely
detailed record of a life forever changed (and quite possibly unhinged) by Jesus’
irruptive presence in her life. The writings of these women contrast sharply in
tone with the spiritual writings of their male contemporaries; their language is
sensual, vibrant, filled with passionate loves and hatreds.
But whether female or male, late medieval mysticism offered a dynamic new
vitality to religious life. Like the Great Alleluia, the preaching of the Franciscans,
the humanized Christ, and the cult of the Virgin, the emphasis was on love and
the understanding that love alone can bring. In the words of an anonymous En-
glish mystic known only as the “Solitary of Durham”: