Forging of Stainless Steel
Revised by Thomas Harris and Eugene Priebe, Armco Inc.
Forgeability
Closed-Die Forgeability. The relative forging characteristics of stainless steels can be most easily depicted through
examples of closed-die forgings. The forgeability trends these examples establish can be interpreted in light of the grade,
type of part, and forging method to be used.
Stainless steels of the 300 and 400 series can be forged into any of the hypothetical parts illustrated in Fig. 1. However,
the forging of stainless steel into shapes equivalent to part 3 in severity may be prohibited by shortened die life (20 to
35% of that obtained in forging such a shape from carbon or low-alloy steel) and by the resulting high cost. For a given
shape, die life is shorter in forging stainless steel than in forging carbon or low-alloy steel.
Fig. 1 Three degrees of forging severity. Dimensions given in inches.
Forgings of mild severity, such as part 1 in Fig. 1, can be produced economically from any stainless steel with a single
heating and about five blows. Forgings approximating the severity of part 2 can be produced from any stainless steel with
a single heating and about ten blows. For any type of stainless steel, die life in the forging of part 1 will be about twice
that in the forging of part 2.
Part 3 represents the maximum severity for forging all stainless steels and especially those with high strength at elevated
temperature; namely, types 309, 310, 314, 316, 317, 321, and 347. Straight-chromium types 403, 405, 410, 416, 420, 430,
431, and 440 are the easiest to forge into a severe shape such as part 3 (although type 440, because of its high carbon
content, would be the least practical). Types 201, 301, 302, 303, and 304 are intermediate between the two previous
groups.
One forge shop has reported that part 3 would be practical and economical to produce in the higher-strength alloys if the
center web were increased from 3 to 6 mm ( to in.) and if all fillets and radii were increased in size. It could then be
forged with 15 to 20 blows and 1 reheating, dividing the number of blows about equally between the first heat and the
reheat.
Hot Upsetting. Forgings of the severity represented by hypothetical parts 4, 5, and 6 in Fig. 2 can be hot upset in one
blow from any stainless steel. However, the conditions are similar to those encountered in hot die forging. First, with a
stainless steel, die wear in the upsetting of part 6 will be several times as great as in the upsetting of part 4. Second, die
wear for the forming of any shape will increase as the elevated-temperature strength of the alloy increases. Therefore,
type 410, with about the lowest strength at high temperature, would be the most economical stainless steel for forming
any of the parts, particularly part 6. Conversely, type 310 would be the least economical.