M5
The method of covariant differentiation
The numerical investigation of specific meteorological problems requires the selec-
tion of a suitable coordinate system. In many cases the best choice is quite obvious.
Attempts to use the same coordinate system for entirely different geometries usu-
ally introduce additional mathematical complexities, which should be avoided. For
example, it is immediately apparent that the rectangular Cartesian system is not
well suited for the treatment of problems with spherical symmetry. The inspection
of the metric fundamental quantities g
ij
or g
ij
and their derivatives helps to decide
which coordinate system is best suited for the solution of a particular problem. The
study of the motion in irregular terrain may require a terrain-following coordinate
system. However, it is not clear from the beginning whether the motion is best
described in terms of covariant or contravariant measure numbers.
From the thermo-hydrodynamic system of equations, consisting of the dynamic
equations, the continuity equation, the heat equation, and the equation of state,
we will direct our attention mostly to the equation of motion using covariant and
contravariant measure numbers. We will also briefly derive the continuity equation
in general coordinates. In addition we will derive the equation of motion using
physical measure numbers of the velocity components if the curvilinear coordinate
lines are orthogonal.
In order to proceed efficiently, it is best to extend the tensor-analytical treatment
presented in the previous chapters by introducing the method of covariant differ-
entiation. What may seem strange and difficult to begin with is, in fact, a very
easy and efficient mathematical treatment that requires no additional theory. Our
discussion in this section will necessarily be quite formal.
M5.1 Spatial differentiation of vectors and dyadics
The situation is particularly simple if we consider the differentiation of a vector A
in a rectangular Cartesian coordinate system:
75