data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9581/c958105921fcbfb170470447fe6f5e18c72e1d8c" alt=""
418
MEASUREMENT
AND
DETECTION
OF
RADIATION
where
B
=
linear background
S
=
step function
=
A(1
-
erf
[(x,
-
x)/&]}
D
=
tail function having an exponential form on the left of the peak and
a Gaussian on the right
In addition to the methods discussed so far, there are others that use mixed
technique^.^^,^^
No matter what the method is, the analysis has to be done by
computer, and numerous computer codes have been developed for that purpose.
Examples are the codes sAMPO?~ SISYPHUS-I1 and SHIITY-11: HYPER-
and GAUSS.37
The determination of the absolute intensity of a gamma requires that the
efficiency of the detector be known for the entire energy range of interest. The
efficiency is determined from information provided by the energy spectrum of
the calibration source. Using the known energy and intensity of the gammas
emitted by the source, a table is constructed giving efficiency of the detector for
the known energy peaks. The efficiency at intermediate points is obtained either
by interpolation or, better yet, by fitting an analytic form to the data of the table
(see Sec. 12.7.1).
As in the case of minimum detectable activity (Sec. 2.20), two types of errors
are encountered when one tries to identify peaks in a complex energy
spectrum.38
Type I arises when background fluctuations are falsely identified as true peaks.
Type I1 arises when fluctuations in the background obscure true peaks. Criteria
are set in the form of confidence limits (see Sec. 2.20 and Ref. 38) that can be
used to avoid both types of errors.
12.7.4 Timing Characteristics
of
the Pulse
For certain measurements, like coincidence-anticoincidence counting or experi-
ments involving accelerators, the time resolution of the signal is also important,
in addition to energy resolution. For timing purposes, it is essential to have
pulses with constant risetime.
No detector produces pulses with exactly the same risetime. This variation is
due to the fact that electrons are produced at different points inside the
detector volume, and thus traverse different distances before they reach the
point of their collection. As a result, the time elapsing between production of
the charge and its collection is not the same for all the carriers
Consider a true coaxial detector, shown in Fig. 12.39~ (see also Fig. 7.26).
Since the electric field is radial, electrons and holes will follow a trajectory
perpendicular to the axis of the detector. The maximum time required for
collection of the charge corresponds to electron-holes being produced either at
A or C. That time
t
is equal to
t
=
(AC)/u, where AC is the detector thickness
and
u
is the speed of electrons or holes. For a detector bias of about 2000
V
and
the size shown in Fig. 12.39a,
u
=
0.1 mm/ns
=
lo5
m/s, which gives a
maximum collection time of 120 ns. The best risetime corresponds to electron-
holes generated at point
B
(Fig. 12.39~) and is equal to about 60 ns.