
28 INTRODUCTION: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES
the People's Republic of China has achieved since 1949. Of course the
base from which this development began was infinitesimal at the start and
real annual increments to productive capacity were similarly tiny. But over
the decades, as growth was compounded, the structure of China's
economy began to change, at first slowly and then more rapidly, until
in the 1970s nearly 50 per cent of China's gross domestic product was
attributable to industry (factories and handicrafts), mining, utilities, and
transportation - not all ' modern' to be sure, but clearly differentiated
from agriculture, whose share had declined from perhaps two-thirds at
the beginning of the century to one-third in 1971.
Nevertheless, the Kuomintang
's
Nanking government and its predeces-
sors in Peking contributed little to this surprisingly vigorous, if still
sectorally and geographically limited, modern economic development.
Pre-modern growth - the increase of both total population and total
output but without sustained per capita increments - such as occurred in
the eighteenth century might not require a substantial state role; indeed
it probably benefited from its absence. But for a late effort to achieve
modern economic growth, larger political inputs are likely to be needed.
The Kuomintang government was not politically strong enough, or
sufficiently adaptable intellectually, to harness and develop the potential
of the private Chinese economy while at the same time ensuring an
acceptable minimum of personal and regional equality.
49
As a result, the small pre-1949 modern industrial sector, in the eighteen
province of China within the Great Wall and in Manchuria, provided the
PRC with managers, technicians, and skilled workers - the cadre that
could train the vastly expanded numbers who would staff the many new
factories that went into production in the 1950s. It was of course largely
unintended, but even if the foreign presence in China before 1949 had
sometimes inhibited independent development, its most efficacious legacy
appears to have been the initial transfer of technology that made possible
China's early industrialization.
Thus the Republic was more than a holding period in which the
economy everywhere remained stagnant while the political system disinte-
grated. On the contrary, aggregate growth in the modern urban sector
see Albert Feuerwerker,
'
Lun erh-shih shih-chi ch 'u-nien Chung-kuo she-hui wei-chi'
(On the
social crisis
in
early twentieth-century China),
in
Ts'ai Shang-ssu,
ed.
LJOI
Cb'ing-mo
Min-cb'u
Chung-kuo sbi-bui
(Chinese society
in the
late Ch'ing
and
early Republic), 129-33.
49
Susan Mann Jones, 'Misunderstanding
the
Chinese economy' skilfully reviews some
of
these
issues with references
to the
literature.
For a
revisionist Soviet view
of the
Kuomintang's
economic policies, which describes
a
combination
of
economic accomplishment
and
political
failure,
see A. V.
Meliksetov,
Sottial'no-ehmomicbesJkaia politika Gomin'dana
v
Kitae.
1)27—1949
(Kuomintang social-economic policy in China, 1927-1949). The relations of the Nationalist regime
to
the
Shanghai merchant community
are
examined
in
Joseph Fewsmith, Party, state, and
local
elite:
in
Republican
China.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008