
CHANGES IN SOCIAL STRUCTURE 41
toriography from the 1950s to the late 1970s stressed the class conscious-
ness of peasant rebels and pointed to poverty, economic inequities
and social oppression as the causes of revolt. Straightforward economic
explanations may account for a range of anti-rent and anti-tax revolts, such
as those associated with the 'Tao-kuang deflation' of the 1840s, the riots
in towns and villages touched off by inflation and new taxes at the end
of the Ch'ing, or the tax protests during the 1930s depression. A focus
on class-consciousness and oppression, however, ignores contrary
evidence and the complexities of rural unrest. In the late 1970s and
early 1980s Chinese historians offered broader interpretations.
72
Another line of explanation looks at primitive (but often organized)
agrarian social protest against landlords, officials and urban capitalists.
Peasants objected to specific injustices and aimed to right specific wrongs,
not to overturn the old social order in favour of a new one. This
perspective, first elaborated as '
social
banditry' in southern Europe, was
broadened through study of food riots and the early English labour
movement, and adapted to analyse peasant reactions when subsistence
village economics were disrupted by imperialist capitalism. While specifics
from other countries cannot necessarily be transferred to Chinese contexts,
the general concept of non-revolutionary, morally-infused protest fits a
range of Chinese rural unrest.
73
71
Two major bibliographic studies of Chinese Marxist historiography are James Harrison, Tbe
Communists
and
Chinese peasant
rebellions:
a study in tbe
rewriting
of
Chinese
history; and Liu
Kwang-Ching, 'World view and peasant rebellion: reflections on post-Mao historiography',
JAS 40.2
(Feb.
1981) 295-306. A theory of
a
class-conscious, revolutionary peasant counter-culture
in Ralph Thaxton,
China turned rigbtsidi
up:
revolutionary legitimacy
in
the peasant world
(chs. i, 8)
requires substantiation. Convincing evidence of correlation between late Ch'ing disturbances,
rice prices and copper devaluation appears in David Faure, 'Local political disturbances in
Kiangsu province, China, 1870-1911' (Princeton University, Ph.D. dissertation, 1976), 270-592.
On this whole question see below, ch. 6 (Bianco).
13
The concept of social banditry derives from Eric Hobsbawm,
Primitive
rebels.
Although criticized
on the ground that all bandits are not socially conscious and many ally themselves with power
holders, not the poor (Anton Blok, "The peasant and brigand: social banditry reconsidered',
Comparative Studies
in
Society
and History, 14.4 (Sept. 1972) 495—504), Hobsbawm's general
assertion of localized, specific, morally infused rural protest appears to hold up. The
phrase'
moral
economy' originated in E. P. Thompson, "The moral economy of the English crowd in the
eighteenth century',
Past and
Present,
50
(Feb.
1971) 76-136. Eric
Wolf,
Peasant wars
of
tbe twentieth
century,
and James Scott, Tbe
moral economy
of
tbe
peasant,
have applied the concept to peasant
societies of Latin America and Indo-China, seeing a basis for union between villagers and
Communist revolutionaries in peasant desire to recapture security and social cohesion lost when
closed villages were invaded by capitalist market forces. Samuel Popkin, Tbe
rational
peasant:
tbe political economy
of
rural society
in Vietnam, suggests that power and interest, not morality,
determined rural relationships. Scott's and Wolf's ideas cannot be applied directly to China where
villages were already commercialized, the direct impact of international capitalism geographically
limited, and traditional rural societies sometimes fragmented and competitive. However, the
general notions of standards of justice and protest of violations can be applied. Some issues are
brought out in
'
Peasant strategies in Asian societies: moral and rational economic approaches - a
symposium', ]AS 52.4 (Aug. 1983) 753-868.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008