687 Duration
25.6 Nonfl at Term Structures and Duration
In a general model of the term structure, payments at time t are dis-
counted by rate r
t
, so that the value of a bond is given by
P
C
r
t
N
t
t
t
=
+
=
∑
1
1()
The duration measure discussed in this chapter assumes either a fl at term
structure (i.e., r
t
= r for all t) or a term structure that shifts in a parallel
fashion. When the term structure exhibits parallel shifts, we can write the
bond price as
P
C
rt
t
N
t
t
t
=
++
=
∑
1
1()Δ
and then derive a measure of duration by taking the derivative with
respect to Δt.
A general model of the term structure should explain how the discount
rate r
t
for time-t payments comes about and how the rates at time t
change. This is a diffi cult problem, one aspect of which we discuss in
Chapter 28. A somewhat simpler problem, discussed in Chapter 27, is the
construction of a polynomial approximation to the term structure.
Does the diffi culty of the problem mean that the simple duration
measure we present in this chapter is useless? Not necessarily. It may be
that the Macauley duration measure gives a good approximation for
changes in bond value as a result of changes in the term structure, even
for the case when the term structure itself is relatively complex and not
fl at.
2
In this section, we explore this possibility, using data from the fi le
McCulloch_term_structures.xls, which is on the disk that accompanies
this book.
3
The fi le contains monthly information on the term structure
of interest rates in the United States for the period 12.1946–2.87 (i.e.,
December 1946–February 1987). A typical row of this fi le looks like
this:
2. A paper by Gultekin and Rogalski (1984) seems to confi rm that it does.
3. The data are from McCulloch (1990). A second fi le on the disk with this book, Daily
treasury yields, 1961–2006.xls gives the daily term structures.