
148 5. Nucleic Acids Structure Minitutorial
5.3.3 The Glycosyl Rotation
Relative to the sugar moiety, the base can assume two major orientations about
the glycosyl C1
–N bond: syn and anti (torsion angles of 0 and 180
o
, respec-
tively) [1080]. Roughly speaking, four major conformations are favored. They
correspond to the combinations of C3
–endo and C2
–endo sugar puckers with
syn and anti values for χ. Favored combinations of {P , χ} pairs vary for the dif-
ferent nucleosides or nucleotides. They depend on the chemical structure of the
sugar, the size of the base, and the nature of the nucleoside substituents (chemi-
cal derivatives). For example, deoxyribose nucleosides and nucleotides prefer the
C2
–endo conformation over C3
–endo [944]. In pyrimidine nucleotides, the anti
orientation of χ about the sugar ring is finely tuned by the sugar pucker [1303].
In Figure 5.7 the two orientations of syn and anti bases are illustrated
for deoxyguanosine in combination with the two common sugar puckers. The
{C3
–endo, syn} combination of this figure (top left) is that observed in the purine
of Z-DNA helices while the {C2
–endo, anti} combination (bottom right) is typ-
ically observed in the B-DNA varieties (and in Z-DNA pyrimidines). Figure 5.9
also shows the distributions of χ in various nucleic-acid structures.
5.3.4 Sugar/Glycosyl Combinations
To further illustrate conformational tendencies in polynucleotides, we gener-
ated adiabatic maps
6
for two models of deoxyadenosine in the {P, χ} space
(Figure 5.10) based on the CHARMM force field [415,803,804]. The first model
approximates solvation simply with a distance-dependent dielectric function. The
latter uses explicit representation of water molecules.
7
The adiabatic maps were calculated by dividing the {P, χ} grid to 3600
points, using 6
o
intervals for each angle. For each selected P , the values of
the 5 endocyclic sugar torsion angles were determined from eq. (5.1)using
τ
max
=40
o
. Starting structures were then generated from the set of variables
{τ
0
,τ
1
,τ
2
,τ
3
,τ
4
,χ} and minimized over the remaining degrees of freedom. Of
course, such a map only provides a reference for conformational flexibility, since
constraining (or freezing) the angles does not allow complete energy relaxation
over all the available degrees of freedom.
We note from Figure 5.10 essentially the same trends for the solvated
(top) and more approximate (bottom) models of four minima corresponding to
6
An adiabatic map is a simple way to examine molecular motion by characteristic low-energy
paths along a prescribed reaction coordinate (i.e., variations in specific conformational variables). For
each combination of these conformational coordinates, the entire potential energy of the system is
minimized to approximate behavior for the motion under study. Though simple in principle, specifi-
cation of the reaction coordinate is difficult in general, and the neglect of other degrees of freedom in
the process is clearly an approximation whose validity depends on the motion in question.
7
Namely, each nucleoside is enveloped in a water sphere of radius 11
˚
A, and the nonbonded inter-
actions are truncated at 12
˚
Ausinga2
˚
A buffer region, a potential shift function for the electrostatic
terms and a potential switch function for the van der Waals terms; see Chapter 10 for details of such
procedures.