336 Lubricant Additives: Chemistry and Applications
properties. This should solidify the case for PMA in those applications where it holds promi-
nent technical advantages. At the same time, PMAs will also continue to evolve to better provide
improvements in shear stability, low-temperature viscometrics, wax interaction, VI, and perhaps,
dispersancy. Current polymer architecture research noted in Section 11.2.4 certainly points in this
direction.
Another important factor for future use of PMAs depends intimately on future base stocks. For
instance, should entirely synthetic polyalphaole n (PAO) base stocks be the choice of the future to
provide enhanced properties, then this would obviate the use of any PPDs, as these base stocks are
wax free. However, additives such as PMA PPDs may be an enabling factor in the use of newer base
stocks such as API group II or API group III base stocks in meeting performance goals that match
or are quite similar to those of API group IV (PAO) base stocks.
For the case of revolutionary equipment changes such as ceramic engine parts or vehicles based
on batteries, fuel cells, or even clean burn systems (e.g., hydrogen or natural gas), lubricant require-
ments will surely change and lubricants themselves will undergo a similar revolution. Most of these
changes would radically alter the chemical and physical characteristics and volumes of lubricants
since the interesting but hostile environment of an internal combustion engine would no longer
dictate the complex chemistry of engine lubricants. If engine lubricant volumes decline because of
radical new materials or power sources, then surely all PPDs and VIIs would experience a propor-
tional decline. However, in other applications, such as hydraulics, where PMA VIIs are primarily
employed, such radical equipment changes do not seem to be on the horizon.
REFERENCES
1. Hochheiser, S. Rohm and Haas, History of a Chemical Company. Philadelphia, PA: University of
Pennsylvania Press, 1986, p. 145.
2. U.S. Patent 2,001,627, Rohm and Haas Co., 1937.
3. U.S. Patent 2,100,993, Rohm and Haas Co., 1937.
4. Van Horne, W.L. Polymethacrylates as viscosity index improvers and pour point depressants. Ind Eng
Chem 41(5):952–959, 1949.
5. Billmeyer, F.W. Textbook of Polymer Science. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1971, pp. 280–310RL
6. Stambaugh, R.L. Viscosity index improvers and thickeners. In R.M. Mortimer. S.T. Orszulik, eds.,
Chemistry and Technology of Lubricants. London: Blackie Academic & Professional, 1997, pp.
144–180.
7. U.S. Patent 2,737,496, E.1. Du Pont de Nernours Co., 1956.
8. U.S. Patent 3.506,574, Rohm and Haas Co., 1970.
9. U.S. Patent 3,732,334, Rohm GmbH, 1973.
10. British Patent 636,998, Rohm and Haas Co., 1964.
11. U.S. Patent 5.863,999, Rohm and Haas Co., 1998.
12. U.S. Patent 4,756,843, Institute Français du Petrol, 1998.
13. U.S. Patent 6,228,819, Rohr and Haas Co., 2001.
14. U.S. Patent Application 0,142,168, RohMax Additives, 2006.
15. U. S. Patent 3,249,545, Shell Oil, 1966.
16. U.S. Patent 3,052,648, Rohm and Haas Co., 1962.
17. U.S. Patent 4,790,948, Texaco Inc., 1988.
18. EP. Patent 569,639, Rohm and Haas Co., 1993.
19. Japanese Patent 4,704,952, Sumitomo Corp., 1972.
20. U.S. Patent 6,140,431, Rohm and Haas Co., 2000.
21. U.S. Patent 4.149.984, Rohm GmbH, 1979.
22. U.S. Patent 4,290,925, Rohm GmbH, 1981.
23. U.S. Patent 4,622,358, Rohm GmbH, 1986.
24. Great Britain Patent 1,559,952, Shell, Intl., 1977.
25. U.S. Patent 6,403,746, RohMax Additives GmbH, 1999.
26. U.S. Patent Application 2007/0082827, Arkema, 2003.
27. German Patent Application DE 103 14 776, RohMax Additives GmbH, 2003.
28. German Patent Application DE 10 2005 015 931, RohMax Additives GmbH, 2005.
CRC_59645_Ch011.indd 336CRC_59645_Ch011.indd 336 10/31/2008 2:18:03 PM10/31/2008 2:18:03 PM