3.7.9 Die Return Springs
Dies moved forward by the strip,finished product, cam or other methods are frequently returned to their
home positions by springs. Choosing the springs is critical. They should havethe sufficient strength to
return the die quickly without exerting too much forceagainst the accelerating device,and havejust
enoughforceatthe home position to ensure that the die does not bounce away from the home position
stops. Therefore, the die return springs are usually long.
Very rarely,rubber bands are used to pull back the dies.
Further Reading
[164] Howtolevelapress for longer life and better performance, MetalForming,November 6–69,
1991.
[165] Murphy,W.P.1985.Quick die-change lifter systems. FABTECH ConferenceProceeding ,
September.
[166] Au,B., Preventing leaks in hydraulic stamping processes, Stamp.J. ,September/October,1997.
[167] Klein, A., Hydraulic presses move to higher production rates, Form.Fabricating,April,18–26,
1998.
[168] Dobbins, D.B.,Aninsidelookatprecision high-speed presses, MetalForming ,August, 23–33, 1991.
[169] Dobbins, D.B.,Precision high-speed presses —special considerations, MetalForming,September,
33–41, 1991.
[170] Dobbins, D.B., Hydraulic presses and their applications, MetalForming,October,31–40, 1991.
[171] Dobbins, D.B., Hydraulic metalworking presses: equipment choices, MetalForming,November,
49–63, 1991.
[172] Mankert,M., Advances extend flexibilityofthe modern hydraulic press, MetalForming,January,
36–40, 1997.
[173] Robbins, T.,Evaluate press performance, MetalForming,January/April, 1995.
[174] Dobbins, D.,Sizing up mechanical gap grame presses, MetalForming,Januar y, 21–42, 1991.
[175] VanDoorn, T. 1987. Application of presses in roll forming lines. SME Improved Roll Forming
Operations Conference,June 23–25, Toronto,Canada, MF87-499.
[176] McGinnis, J.M., The servo controlled flying cut-offreduces scrap and downtime, Fabricator,2,
April, 21–24, ,1982.
[177] Kelley,R., Air actuated clutch/brakes, Des. Eng.,February, 16–18, 1991.
[178] Young,S.E., Press isolators: their function and effectiveness, Met. Stamp. ,February, 1980.
[179] Leighton, D.R. 1987. Die change systems for increased press uptime. FABTECH Conference,
September 28–October 1, Chicago,IL, MF87-603.
[180] Crainich, L., Pre-maturewear of punches, MetalForming,March, 81, 1997.
[181] Crainich, L., Slug return problems, MetalForming,September,70–71, 1991.
[184] Tooling Technology, Safe productive die clamping, MetalForming,July,66–69,1999.
[217] Hogse, E., Understanding digitally controlled die accelerators for rollformed sections, Fabricator,
November/December,13–17, 1977.
[218]McGinnis, J.,The digital, electro-hydraulicservocontr olledflyingCcutoff, FMA, PaperNo. F-1960.
[221] Botting,D., Monitoring roll forming and tube mill cutoff, Fabricator,April, 22–25, 1997.
[222] Allman, R., Open loop flying die punch and cutoffpresses: improving performancewith
microprocessors, Fabricator,March, 16–18, 1990.
[416] Wick, C., Benedict, J.,and Veilleux, R., Tooling and Manufacturing Engineering Handbook—
Vol.2, Forming.SME, 1989.
[423] Cam TechnologyAdvances RotaryPunch/Shear Capabilities, Mod. Met.,August, 23–25, 2002.
Roll Forming Handbook3 -26