accurately asimple roll forming process. Most of these simulations require large computers and lengthy
CPU time, which are not available to most roll designers, but some of the results havefound their way
into commercially available roll design systems.
However,regardless of the sophistication of the presently available programs, the know-how and
expertise of the rolldesigners cannot be replaced. There is no doubt that further research in this field can
yield additional data that willreduce the uncertainties which still exist in the roll design.
The following examples will show how asimple factor,such as the sequence of bending established by
the designer,willinfluence the flowofmaterial, the stresses developed in the strip and the provision for
the operator to compensate for the nonuniformityofthe material.
5.15 Examples
The first example shows some but not all of the bending sequence possibilities for asimple “C” channel
illustrated in Figure 5.170.
Figure5.170aLips at edges are formed completely in the first passes,
Figure5.170bLip forming starts at the first pass, but it is completed in the sixth (last) pass,
Figure5.170cSame as Figure5.170b, but the final lip bending is in Pass #5,
Figure5.170dLegs are formed first, lips are formed in the last pass.
Figure5.170eAll angles are bent in each pass.
In the case of more complicated shapes, the permutations in forming sequence and magnitude are
limitless.
Even the forming of asimple “U” channel can be accomplished in different ways depending on the
number of passes and the preferenceofthe designer (Figure5.171).
*
Shortlegs formed from thin material may be accomplished in 2passes (Figure5.171a). Forthick
or highstrength material, the first pass may requireavery shallow bend to drive the material in.
This is equally applicable to Figure5.171b–e. Examples shown in these figures disregard the
overbending requirements.
*
Figure5.171bshows the same section, but because of the condition, the leg is formed in 3passes.
Some designers may elect to haveaneven increase in all the process (b1) or haveasmaller increase
in the first and third passes, and alarger one in the second pass.
*
If longer length or other conditions necessitate morepasses, then again the designer may elect to
have4equal increase in angles (22.58 per pass; see Figure5.171c1) or 208 in the first and last pass,
and 258 in the second and third passes (Figure5.171c2), or even smaller first and last pass
deformation (15 and 308 in the second and third passes).
*
Some designers divide the horizontal axis to equal distances to establish the bending angles
(Figure 5.171d). This figure shows the forming in five passes. The author does not recommend this
approach.
*
Awell-proven approach is to add asmall first pass forming angle, about 158 ,depending on the
thickness and mechanical properties of the material, to ensure asmooth, unaided entryofthe strip
end into the first pass. Forthicker,highstrength material, this angle may havetobereduced to 0 8 .
*
The last pass may be only a58 bend from 85 to 908 (Figure 5.171e). The remaining angles (in the
example shown on this figure) 708 is divided by 4(because thereisatotal of six passes in the
example). The second and the one before the last bending will be reduced and the in-between
angle increased to arrive to the total 908 (e.g., 10, 17, 20.5, 20.5, 17, and 5 8 ). This approach
provides the closest to asmooth slow-startslow-finish and faster in-between bending. The angles
maybecorrected by viewing the top view of the flow diagram to provide asmooth “S” shape.
There is an unusual, but veryeconomical, way to form deeper channels from thin material. To minimize
edge strain, the full depth is achieved in along horizontal center distancebetween an entrypass and
Roll Forming Handbook5 -100