162 6 Multispectral Transformations of Image Data
R.J. Kauth and G.S. Thomas, 1976: The Tasseled Cap – A Graphic Description of the Spectral-
Temporal Development ofAgricultural Crops as Seen by Landsat. Proc. LARS 1976 Symp.
on Machine Process. Remotely Sensed Data, Purdue University.
S.I. Olsen, 1993: Estimation of Noise in Images: an Evaluation. Graphical Models and Image
Processing, 55, 319–323.
J.A. Richards, 1984: Thematic Mapping from Multitemporal Image Data Using the Principal
Components Transformation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 16, 35–46.
A. Santisteban and L. Muñoz, 1978: Principal Components of a Multispectral Image: Appli-
cation to a Geologic Problem. IBM J. Research and Development, 22, 444–454.
J.M. Soha and A.A. Schwartz, 1978: Multispectral Histogram Normalization Contrast En-
hancement. Proc. 5th Canadian Symp. on Remote Sensing, 86–93.
P.H. Swain and S.M. Davis (Eds.), 1978: Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach, New
York, McGraw-Hill.
M.M. Taylor, 1973: Principal Components Colour Display of ERTS Imagery. Third Earth
Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium, NASA SP-351, 1877–1897.
Problems
6.1 (a) At a conference research group A and research group B both presented papers on
the value of the principal components transformation (also known as the Karhunen-Loève or
Hotelling transform) for reducing the number of features required to represent image data.
Group A described very good results that they had obtained with the method whereas Group
B indicated that they felt it was of little use. Both groups were using image data with only two
spectral components. The covariance matrices for their respective images are:
Σ
A
=
5.44.5
4.56.1
Σ
B
28.04.2
4.216.4
Explain the points of view of both groups.
(b) If information content can be related directly to variance indicate how much information
is discarded if only the first principal component is retained by both groups.
6.2 Suppose you have been asked to describe the principal components transformation to a
non-specialist. Write a single paragraph summary of its essential features, using diagrams if
you wish, but no mathematics.
6.3 (For those mathematically inclined), Demonstrate that the principal components transfor-
mation matrix developed in Sect. 6.1.2 is orthogonal.
6.4 Colour image products formed from principal components generally appear richer in
colour than a colour composite product formed by combining the original bands of remote
sensing image data. Why do you think that is so?
6.5 (a) The steps involved in computing principal component images may be summarised as:
calculation of the image covariance matrix
eigenanalysis of the covariance matrix
computation of the principal components.
Assessments can be made in the first two steps as to the likely value in proceeding to compute
the components. Describe what you would look for in each case.
(b) The covariance matrix need not be computed over the full image to produce a principal