
Appendix A Solutions to self-assessment activities 677
Based on cash flows
Incorporates the time-value of money Estimating the appropriate discount rate is
difficult in practice
Internal rate of return
Based on cash flows Can incorrectly rank projects
Incorporates the time-value of money Difficult to calculate without a computer
Accounting rate of return
Can be related to accounts Ignores time-value of money
Based on profits not cash flows Problems in setting the required return
5.4 Evaluation of mutually exclusive projects using IRR and NPV approaches can produce different recommen-
dations. This is particularly the case where projects are very different in scale or where the cash flow profiles
of the various alternatives differ significantly. In such circumstances, the NPV approach is the better method.
5.5 Project Y offers the highest NPV for all discount rates up to 17 per cent. At the 12 per cent cost of capital,
it offers a better cash return than Project X.
5.6 Soft capital rationing is internally imposed by the firm. This may be because management is unwilling to
borrow or wishes to pursue a policy of stable growth. Hard rationing is externally imposed by the capital
market. No additional external finance is available to the firm. Capital for a single period may be resolved
by applying the profitability index to investment cash flows. Multi-period rationing requires a form of
mathematical programming.
5.7 The modified IRR is that rate of return which, when the initial outlay is compared with the terminal value
of the project’s cash flows reinvested at the cost of capital, gives an NPV of zero. Whereas the IRR method
implicitly assumes that cash flows generated by the project are reinvested at the project’s internal rate of
return, the modified IRR assumes reinvestment at the cost of capital. This means that it gives the same
investment advice as the NPV approach.
CHAPTER 6
6.1 Incremental cash flows, applied to capital budgeting, are the additional cash flows created as a direct result
of making an investment decision. Frequently, identifying these is not as straightforward as one might
think, particularly where replacement decisions are involved or where decisions in one part of the business
have ramifications for other parts.
6.2 The original cost of developing the drug is a sunk cost and should not form part of the analysis. Any adverse
effects on other parts of the business resulting from the decision to manufacture the product are an associat-
ed cash flow and should be included in the analysis. The external sale value of the patent is an opportunity
cost of proceeding with production. The million cost should be deducted from the project’s cash flows.
6.3 To: Sid Torrance
From: Rick Faldo
Clubs for Beginners Proposal
I have re-examined the points raised in your e-mail and discussed them with our accountant.
In analysing capital projects, only future investment cash flows incremental to the business are relevant to
the decision.
1 Depreciation is not a cash flow – it is a charge against profits. By comparing operating cash flows
against initial outlay, the need for depreciation becomes unnecessary.
2 Only additional fixed costs resulting from the introduction of the new project should be charged. I have
checked that no extra overheads are incurred.
3 The market research is a past cost. Its existence is not dependent upon the outcome of the decision, so
it should not be included.
£10
CFAI_Z01.QXD 10/26/05 5:42 PM Page 677