7.1 Modeling of 123 Phase Solidification from Liquid 317
the solid and liquid phases. In this case, a homogeneous formation of 123
nuclei is impossible, and the figurative point, describing melt, displaces into
L +BaCuO
2
+ CuO region, resulting in the solidification of barium cuprate.
There are two causes for breaking of usual equilibrium between liquid and
solid 123 phase: (i) a growth of the 211 particles (due to their different sizes
and well-known Ostwald ripening), reducing interphase interface with melt,
decreasing yttrium flux into liquid, leading to envelopment of these particles
by solidification front with rejection of the yttrium-depleted melt at the inter-
granular boundaries and finally initiating a de-lamination of the system; (ii)
a decreasing of the thermal stability of 123 nuclei in the liquid, leading to ab-
sence of dominating 123 solidification even at sufficient yttrium concentration
[318]. These causes change the stoichiometry of liquid in the case of trapping
of large 211 particles [334], and even solidification of pure 011 phase [318].
The development of the model [475] for the case of low G/R ratio is carried
out in [936]. The microstructure close to the quenched solid–liquid interface
exhibits bridges of 123 material between the solidifying 123 interface and
211 particles. In order to describe their morphologies, a combination of both
phenomena, namely a peritectic reaction being mediated by the liquid and a
peritectic transformation of the 211 particles, being linked to the solidification
front via bridges of 123 phase, is necessary. Note that all the above models
neglect peritectic transformation [494]. The principal difference of the model
[936] from the models [156, 475, 741] is the account of influence on the process
of the 123 phase formation of Lifschitz–Zlyozov boundary effects [291, 629,
997, 1090], and action of the capillary attraction forces between moving front
of the 123 phase solidification and 211 particles into liquid.
The entire local process of the engulfment of 211 particles into the so-
lidifying interface can be explained, considering four steps: (i) liquid-phase
diffusion-controlled growth, following the temperature gradient, if the 211
particle is far away from the phase boundary (see Fig. 7.15a); (ii) bridge for-
mation, when the 123 interface faces an increased Y
3+
concentration gradient,
when being approached by a 211 particle (see Fig. 7.15b); (iii) peritectic sur-
face reaction during the engulfment process (see Fig. 7.15c); and (iv) peritectic
transformation (negligible effect compared to previous steps) (see Fig. 7.15d).
Due to the peritectic character of the 123 phase creation, this phase needs
a Y-concentration that is not provided by the melt, being in equilibrium with
the 211 phase. Therefore, as in classical nucleation theory, a depletion zone
arises and the growth of the 123 phase is driven by a concentration gradient
in the depletion zone, δ, close to the 123 interface. At the same time, the
dissolving 211 particles maintain a medium yttrium concentration in liquid,
c
m
, corresponding to the Ostwald ripening theory.
Bridge formation starts when the depletion zone ahead of the 123 phase
boundary and dissolution region of the 211 particle begin to overlap (see
Fig. 7.15b). The increased concentration gradient leads to an accelerated
growth of the 123 phase toward the 211 particles, resulting in a bridge.