168 3 The Theory of Spinors
conjugate of ξ by specifying that its components
¯
ξ
˙
A
1
···
˙
A
r
X
1
···X
r
in any spin
frame are given by
¯
ξ
˙
A
1
···
˙
A
r
X
1
···X
r
= ξ
A
1
···A
r
˙
X
1
···
˙
X
r
(here we must depart from our habit of selecting dotted/undotted indices
from the end/beginning of the alphabet). Thus, for example, if ξ has compo-
nents ξ
A
˙
X
, then the components of
¯
ξ are given by
¯
ξ
˙
01
= ξ
0
˙
1
,
¯
ξ
˙
11
= ξ
1
˙
1
,etc.
Exercise 3.3.7 Show that we have actually defined a spinor of the required
type by verifying the appropriate transformation law, i.e.,
¯
ˆ
ξ
˙
A
1
···
˙
A
r
X
1
···X
r
=
¯
G
˙
A
1
˙
C
1
···
¯
G
˙
A
r
˙
C
r
G
X
1
U
1
···G
X
r
U
r
¯
ξ
˙
C
1
···
˙
C
r
U
1
···U
r
.
Entirely analogous definitions and results apply regardless of the positions
(upper or lower) of the indices, provided only that the number of dotted
indices is the same as the number of undotted indices. We shall say that
such a spinor ξ is Hermitian if
¯
ξ = ξ.Thus,forexample,ifξ is of va-
lence
rr
00
,thenitisHermitianif
¯
ξ
A
1
···A
r
˙
X
1
···
˙
X
r
= ξ
A
1
···A
r
˙
X
1
···
˙
X
r
for all
A
1
,...,A
r
,
˙
X
1
,...,
˙
X
r
, i.e., if
ξ
˙
A
1
···
˙
A
r
X
1
···X
r
= ξ
A
1
···A
r
˙
X
1
···
˙
X
r
,
e.g., if r =1,
ξ
˙
01
= ξ
0
˙
1
, ξ
0
˙
0
= ξ
˙
00
,etc.
As a multilinear functional a spinor ξ operates on four distinct types of
objects (elements of ß,
¯
ß, ß
∗
and
¯
ß
∗
) and, if the valence is
rs
mn
,has
r + s + m + n “slots” (variables) into which these objects are inserted for
evaluation, each slot corresponding to an index position in our notation
for ξ’s components. If ξ has the property that, for two such slots of the
same type, ξ(...,p,...,q,...)=ξ(...,q,...,p,...) for all p and q of the
appropriate type, then ξ is said to be symmetric in these two variables (if
ξ(...,p,...,q,...)=−ξ(...,q,...,p,...), it is skew-symmetric). It follows at
once from the definition that ξ is symmetric (skew-symmetric) in the vari-
ables p and q if and only if the components of ξ in every spin frame are
unchanged (change sign) when the corresponding indices are interchanged.
We will be particularly interested in the case of spinors with just two indices.
Thus, for example, a spinor φ of valence
00
20
is symmetric (in its only two
variables) if and only if, in every spin frame, φ
BA
= φ
AB
for all A, B =1, 0; φ
is skew-symmetric if φ
BA
= − φ
AB
for all A and B. On the other hand, an
arbitrary spinor ξ of valence
00
20
has a symmetrization whose components
in each spin frame are given by
ξ
(AB)
=
1
2
(ξ
AB
+ ξ
BA
)