122 2 Skew-Symmetric Linear Transformations and Electromagnetic Fields
The equality in (2.7.18) legitimizes the following definition: If F is a skew-
symmetric linear transformation on M and
0
F is its associated bilinear form
we define the dual of
0
F to be the bilinear form
∗
0
F : M×M→R whose
value at (u, v) ∈M×Mis
∗
0
F (u, v)=
∗
F
ab
u
a
v
b
. (2.7.20)
Exercise 2.7.7 assures us that this definition is independent of the partic-
ular admissible basis in which the calculations are performed. Moreover,
Exercise 2.7.6 and the above-mentioned duality between the first and sec-
ond pairs of equations in (2.7.1) make it clear that the first of Maxwell’s
equations
(2.
7.9)i
sequivalentto
∗
F
ab,c
+
∗
F
bc,a
+
∗
F
ca ,b
=0, a,b,c=1, 2, 3, 4, (2.7.21)
or, more concisely,
d
∗
0
F =0.
We should point out that the linear transformation F , its associated bilinear
form
0
F and the dual
∗
0
F of
0
F all contain precisely the same information
from both the mathematical and the physical points of view (examine their
matrices in terms of
E
and
B
). Some matters are more conveniently discussed
in terms of F . For others, the appropriate choice is
0
F or
∗
0
F . Some calculations
are simplest when carried out with the F
a
b
, whereas for others one might
prefer to work with F
ab
,orF
ab
,or
∗
F
ab
. One must become comfortable with
this sort of shifting perspective. In particular, one must develop a facility
for the “index gymnastics” that, as we have seen already in this section, are
necessitated by such a shift. To reinforce this point, to prepare gently for
Chapter 3 and to derive a very important property of the energy-momentum
transformation, we pause to provide a bit more practice.
Exercise 2.7.8 Show that, for any skew-symmetric linear transformation
F : M→M,
1
2
F
ab
F
ab
= |
B
|
2
−|
E
|
2
and
1
4
∗
F
ab
F
ab
=
E
·
B
.
Next we consider a skew-symmetric linear transformation F : M→M
and its associated energy-momentum transformation T : M→Mgiven by
(2.5.1). Define a bilinear form
0
T : M×M
→R by
0
T (u,
v)=u · Tv for
all
(u, v) ∈M×M.Then
0
T is symmetric, i.e.,
0
T (v, u)=
0
T (u, v)by(2.5.2).
Now let {e
a
} be an admissible basis and [T
a
b
]thematrixofT relative to this
basis (see (2.5.4)). For all a, b =1, 2, 3, 4,
we
let T
ab
= T (e
a
,e
b
)=e
a
·Te
b
=
η
aγ
T
γ
b
. Then, if u = u
a
e
a
and v = v
b
e
b
,wehaveT (u, v)=T
ab
u
a
v
b
just as
in Exercise 2.7.4. As an exercise in index manipulation and because we will
need the result in Chapter 3 we show that T
ab
canbewrittenintheform
T
ab
=
1
4π
F
aα
F
b
α
−
1
4
η
ab
F
αβ
F
αβ
, (2.7.22)