1. Steady Internal Compressible Viscous Flow
411
Solution: a) We assume ideal gas behavior for natural gas, uniform properties at
each cross section, and negligible changes in elevation. We find frictional pres-
sure drop at 15 mile intervals from Equation IIIc.1.19, assuming isothermal flow
in the pipe:
Re = VD/v = 45 × 2.25/2.62E-5 = 3.864E6. Hence, f = 0.184/Re
0.2
= 0.00886 (for
smooth pipe)
c
1
= RT
1
/
2
1
V = (1545/16) × (460 + 80)/(45 × 45/32.2) = 829.15
c
2
= fL/D = 0.00886 × (15 × 5280)/2.25 = 311.87
829.15ȟ – ln ȟ – 517.28 = 0
By iteration (or simply ignoring ln
ξ
) we find
ξ
≈ 0.6233. Hence, P
2
/P
1
=
ξ
1/2
=
(0.6233)
1/2
= 0.7895. Therefore, P
2
= 0.7895(120) = 94.74 psia and ∆P = 120 –
94.74 = 25.26 psi (0.174 MPa).
b) The pumping power is needed to compensate for the unrecoverable pressure
loss over the 15 miles of piping between successive pumping stations. Pumping
power is given be Equation IIIc.1.34 and IIIc.1.35:
»
»
»
¼
º
«
«
«
¬
ª
−
−
+−−=
−
)1(
1
)1(
2
1
2
2
2
1
γ
γ
γ
γ
rRTr
V
mW
s
where
A =
π
D
2
/4 = 3.14×(2.25)
2
/4 = 3.976 ft
2
(0.369)
R = R
u
/M = 1545/16 = 96.56 ft·lbf/lbmole·R (0.519 kJ/kmol·K)
ρ
1
= P
1
/RT
1
= 144×120/[96.56(460 + 80) = 0.331 lbm/ft
3
(5.3 kg/m
3
)
== AVm
11
ρ
0.331×45 ×3.976 = 59.22 lbm/s (26.86 kg/s)
r = P
3
/P
2
= P
1
/P
2
= 120/94.74 = 1.267
2
20.3/1.3
45 1.3
59.22[ (1 1.267 ) 96.56(460 80)(1.267 1)]
2 32.2 0.3
W =− − + + − =
×
–7.5E5 ft·lbf/s (–1 MW)
B. Flow Rate Measurement of Compressible Fluids
In measuring flow rate of compressible fluids with Bernoulli obstruction meters,
we must take into account the compressibility effect, due to the noticeable change
in the density of the compressible fluid through such devices. The pressure drop
associated with the flow of compressible fluids, especially through a thin-plate ori-
fice, causes the flow to expand adiabatically and density to decrease downstream
of the throat. Our goal is to find an expression similar to Equation IIIb.4.4, that
was derived for the mass flow rate of incompressible fluids. Recall that in the
derivation of Equation IIIb.4.4, which was based on Equation IIIa.3.33, we used
the Bernoulli equation. Here, however, due to the change in the fluid density, we
cannot use the Bernoulli equation. We then start with the energy equation. To
begin the derivation, consider flow through the venturi of Figure IIIb.4.3 where