80 5 Drilling: A General Discussion the Importance of Drilling
and grade are defined. For the most efficient path to discovery, the explorationist has
to make use of all available knowledge.
When geologists drill targeted holes they are testing a mental model of the size,
shape and attitude of a hoped for ore body. The more accurate that model, the greater
the chance that the hole will be successful. The model is the result of extensive
detailed preparatory studies on the prospect, involving literature search, examination
of known outcropping mineralisation, geological mapping at regional and detailed
scales as well as geochemical and geophysical studies. These are the procedures
that are described in the first four chapters of this book, and in Chap. 9. Compared
to drilling, such preliminary studies are relatively cheap. Each drill hole into a
prospect, whether it makes an intersection of mineralisation or not, (and perhaps
especially if it does not), will increase geological knowledge and lead to modifica-
tion or confirmation of the model and so affect the positioning of subsequent holes.
The first few targeted holes into a prospect are always hard work, and it is in how
she treats this stage of exploration that the explorationist most clearly reveals her
true worth.
In order to most efficiently define the size and shape of a potential orebody, drill
holes will normally be aimed at intersecting the boundaries of the mineralisation
at an angle as close to 90
◦
as possible. If the expected mineralization has a tabular,
steep-dipping shape, the ideal drill holes to test it will be angle holes with an inclina-
tion opposed to the direction of dip of the body. If the direction of dip is not known
(as is often the case when drilling in an area of poor outcrop, or testing a surface geo-
physical or geochemical anomaly), then at least two holes with opposed dips, inter-
secting below the anomalous body, will need to be planned in order to be sure of an
intersection of the target. Flat-lying mineralization (such as a recent placer deposit, a
supergene-enriched zone above primary mineralization, or perhaps a manto deposit)
is normally best tested by vertical holes. These are not the only considerations. Holes
are normally positioned to intersect mineralization at depths where good core or cut-
tings return can be expected. If the target is primary mineralization, the hole will be
aimed to intersect below the anticipated level of the oxidized zone.
Ore bodies – such as stockwork or disseminated vein deposits – that are nor-
mally mined in bulk along with their immediate enclosing barren or low-grade host
rock can present special problems for drill targeting. The boundaries of the miner-
alized zone determine the size of the zone and hence the tonnage of ore present;
mineralized structures within the body, however, control the distribution of grade,
and these structures may not be parallel to the overall boundaries of the zone. In
the case of such deposits, the drilling direction that is ideal to assess overall grade
may be very inefficient at defining tonnage. However, for initial exploration drilling,
it is normally better for the first holes to be aimed at proving grade, rather than
tonnage.
Once an intersection in a potential ore body has been achieved (a situation often
described as having a “foot-in-ore”), step-out holes from the first intersection are
then drilled to determine the extent of the mineralization. The most efficient drill
sampling of a tabular, steep-dipping ore body is to position deep holes and shal-
low holes in a staggered pattern on alternate drill sections. However, the positions