
dissolution intermediate. The emission efficiency for Fe(III) contains the same
two domains of frequency but with quite different properties. Both are located in
the negative real part region with modulus maximum around the transition
frequency (0.1 Hz). Therefore both surface species participate as sources of
dissolution of Fe(III). This is consistent with the generally accepted concept of a
passivity current carried by the Fe(III) released by the film lattice. Finally, the
capacitance Γ
s
associated with the total charge as Fe(II) plus Fe(III) indicates that
around 5.5 mC V
1
cm
–2
are needed for passivation. Most of the current decay
takes place within 0.2 V; therefore the charge content of the passive film at the
Flade potential can be estimated as 1 mC cm
–2
. This value is practically equal to
the charge equivalent to one monolayer (one cell unit of a ferric oxide layer).
A kinetic model very close to that elaborated more recently for interpreting
the transient dissolution of laser beam–depassivated iron was proposed. It made it
possible to reproduce the main features of N
d
and Γ
s
shown in Figure 9.
Dissolution in the Passive State
Anodic dissolution in the active state generally results in equivalent corrosion rates
unacceptable in practical applications (order of mA cm
2
or more). Self-limitation of
the dissolution rate by the buildup of a thin surface layer under sufficiently oxidizing
conditions, known as passivation, is the only relevant phenomenon in terms of
corrosion control. The mechanism of dissolution in the passive state is dealt with in
the following. A thorough survey of the field can be found in the proceedings volume
of the last passivity symposia [118,122]
Film Relaxation and Dissolution in the Passive State
After completion of a full coverage through the initial stages of passivation, the
subsequent behavior of a passivated metal is entirely determined by the bulk
properties of the passive film and the reactions at its boundary interfaces with the
metal and the electrolyte. In spite of the enormous amount of research carried out
since Faraday’s time, relations between the solid-state chemistry of the barrier
layer and the electrochemistry of the passive metal remain largely unclear.
Concepts, Models, and Experimental Approaches Separation between film
relaxation (growth or dissolution) and metal corrosion in the passive state is
meaningless except at perfect steady state because both aspects of metal oxidation
are intimately interrelated by the charge and mass balances at the metal-film-
electrolyte interface.
Anodic Dissolution 127
The overall charge balance is expressed as
where I is the external current flowing to the electrode, I
G
the component of I
involve in the film growth, and I
C
the corrosion current measuring the flux of
metal cations released in the solution. Equation (41) must be considered algebraically;
i.e., a negative (cathodic) value of I will produce film destruction by cathodic
reduction and possibly a decrease of the corrosion current. Steady state is naturally
defined for a constant film thickness, I
G
= 0, and therefore an external current
equal to the corrosion current.
Most of the concepts introduced for modeling film growth and dissolution have
their origin in the theory of thermal (dry) oxidation initially adapted to thick (wet)
Copyright © 2002 Marcel Dekker, Inc.