352 D.K. Stoyko et al.
parameters constant, for each individual cut-off frequency. The largest permissible
variation in each of the three parameters is termed the uncertainty. These uncertain-
ties are propagated by using standard uncertainty estimation techniques for each of
the variables derived from the three properties calculated by the inversion scheme.
27.6 Illustrative Examples
Two examples are presented next that illustrate the inversion technique. A numerical
simulation using a priori known material properties and dimensions is given first.
This is followed by a real experimental example for a similar pipe.
27.6.1 Numerical Simulation
An idealized 80-mm Diameter Nominal (DN), Schedule 40, seamless, carbon steel
pipe is considered first. Its dimensional and material properties are summarized in
Table 27.1. This particular pipe is selected because it is commercially important.
At the end of 1997, for example, there was approximately 64,900 km of such pipe
in industrial use as energy-related pipeline in Alberta, Canada [1]. Consequently it
has been studied extensively as in, for example, [2, 3, 10]. The radial displacement
is calculated on the pipe’s outer surface at D 0 and z
D z=H D 5:1,byusing
(27.14) as described in [19]. The resulting time history is presented in Fig. 3a of
[19]. The corresponding DFT and temporal curve fit are given in Figs. 3d and 3c,
respectively, of [19]. Table 2 of [19] compares the cut-off frequencies obtained from
the computed FRF, DFT, and temporal curve fit. The inversion procedure and uncer-
tainty estimation are applied for the cut-off frequencies from the temporal curve fit.
The results are summarized in Table 27.1. This table shows that the assigned and re-
covered material and dimensional properties generally agree within their estimated
uncertainties.
Table 27.1 Comparing assigned values with those computed from inversion
Property Assigned value Computed value
Young’s modulus, E (GPa) 216:9 216 ˙ 2
Lam´e constant [Shear modulus], [G](GPa) 84:3 84:5 ˙0:5
Lam´e constant, (GPa) 113:2 109 ˙ 4
Ratio of Lam´e constants, .=/ 1:34 1:29 ˙ 0:04
Poisson’s ratio, 0:287 0:282 ˙0:004
Outer diameter, D
0
(mm) 88:8 –
Thickness, H (mm) 5:59 5:596 ˙ 0:007
Mean radius, R (mm) 41:6 41:60 ˙0:05
Thickness to mean radius ratio, .H=R/ 0:134 0:1345 ˙ 0:0002
Mass density, (kg=m
3
) 7,932 –