108 G. Quintana, J. de Ciurana and F. J. Campa
Thus, it can be seen in Eq. 3.10 that tool deflection in the static model is
a function of the following three parameters, E is the Young’s modulus for the
tool material, L
H
3
/D
4
is the tool slenderness parameter. D is the equivalent tool
diameter (the tool is not a cylindrical beam) and L
H
is the overhang length. F is
the cutting force perpendicular to the tool axis. In [15] a complete study of the
stiffness of machine, tool, and couplings between toolholder and spindle and
tool and toolholder is explained.
• In turning or cylindrical grinding, the flexibility of the workpiece. Really the
workpiece clamped in the chuck is a prolongation of the spindle with a flexible
internal link (the chuck itself). If the part is short with a large diameter, the
chuck usually clamps it sufficiently and the tailstock can be used to increase the
stiffness. If the part is long or very slender the use of “steady rests’” is recom-
mended, as seen in Chap. 1, Fig. 1.30 in the case of heavy-duty lathes.
3.5.3 Dynamic Behaviour and Vibrations
Vibrations in milling appear due to the lack of dynamic stiffness of some compo-
nent of the machine tool-tool-workpiece system. They can be divided into two
main groups: forced and self-excited vibrations. The former vibration type, sup-
posing that the tool and spindle subsystem is well balanced and supported in
a milling machine on an isolating foundation, is due to the variable chip thickness
and the interrupted nature of the process. This means that they are always present.
Therefore, to prevent damaging the tool and/or spindle, the vibration level must be
maintained under a threshold value. Another source of forced vibration is the use
of inadequate or misbalanced tools. As previously mentioned, high frequency
spindles have the maximum speed limited below the critical speed, but the use of
inadequate tools can shift the critical speed near the operating speed range with
disastrous consequences.
Regarding the latter type, the most common self-excited vibration in milling is
the “regenerative chatter”. Huge efforts have been made to understand, predict and
avoid this kind of vibration since the beginnings of the 20th century and especially
during the last twenty years [2,
5,
7,
9,
17,
18,
27]. Since milling is an intrinsically
interrupted cutting operation, vibrations always appear, and therefore the cutting
edge leaves waviness in the surface material. The difference of phase between the
current cutting edge vibration and the waviness produced in the previous pass,
results in a variable chip thickness and a highly variable cutting force; this excites
structural modes of the machine, the spindle-toolholder-tool and the workpiece
system. If a component of this system lacks dynamic stiffness or damping, dis-
placements and forces become higher at each tooth pass and the process becomes
unstable. The relation between forces and displacements was well summarized by
Merrit [11], proposing a regenerative loop similar to Fig. 3.26.
Chatter vibration can be completely prevented calculating the “stability lobes”
diagrams. These diagrams indicate the limiting chatter-free axial depth of cut at each