4 New Developments in Drives and Tables 139
desired maximum speed without encountering problems with the critical speed it
is necessary to use long pitches per turn, which to a great extent conditions the
remaining requirements.
On the other hand, when the screws are long or the pitches are very small, the
rotary inertia may be large, even more so than that of the slide on moving. In this case,
a solution based on a rotary nut provides greater acceleration with a small motor.
When a rotary nut is used, the nut and motor can be shifted, as well as the
screw. The second solution is used to drive slides whose length is greater than the
required stroke, for example long worktables. Through the rotary nut solution,
slides are driven with strokes of up to 10 or 12 metres, although 6 or 8 metres are
not usually exceeded.
4.3 Linear Drives by Rack and Pinion
Drives through rack and pinion are preferably used when the stroke of the slide to
be used is greater than 4 or 5 metres.
The main advantage of the rack and pinion drive vs ball screw drive is that the
characteristics do not depend on the slide stroke. The slide stroke does not limit
either the maximum speed or the drive or affect the stiffness, unlike what occurs in
case of the ball screw. In addition, it permits us to obtain high feed rates and it is
common to reach 120
m/min.
On the other hand, the rack and pinion drive does not provide the high
reduction that the ball screw can provide. In order to provide a greater reduction,
pinions of as small a diameter as possible should be used, between 15 and 20
teeth.
Therefore, a reducer should be used to obtain the same force and acceleration
performance as the screw.
4.3.1 The Elimination of the Gap
A basic aspect for any type of machine tool drive is the elimination of gaps. In
case of the rack and pinion drive, the solutions to provide an operation without
gaps have undergone an important development in the last few years.
In this type of drive, the main gap is between the teeth of the pinion and teeth
of the rack. To eliminate this gap, two pinions are used working on the same rack,
each supported on a different side of the rack and consequently pushing in
a reverse direction. Other systems, such as the split pinion with a single reducer, or
any solutions used in the past, did not completely eliminate the intrinsic play
which exists on the inside of the reducer and, consequently, does not result in
being a valid option for the machine tool.
There are different ways of providing a preload between both gearboxes. This can
be provided through mechanical means (Fig. 4.8). The following figure shows two