10.6 Laboratory systems 383
irregular index cycles observed in the Earth's midlatitudes. Shape vacillation
is characterized by a more constant amplitude and hence heat flux; instead
the direction of the trough line fluctuates, leading to a large fluctuation in
the momentum flux carried by the eddies.
One of the most interesting aspects of the annulus system is that it
suggests several ways in which nonlinearity can be manifested in a baroclinic
system. All the wavy flows we have discussed have finite amplitude waves
whose mean intensity has equilibrated to the zonal flow; the linear processes
generating eddy kinetic energy balance the nonlinear cascade of kinetic
energy down to smaller scales where diffusive processes can remove it. This
nonlinear limiting may lead steady, regular waves, to vacillating waves with
periodic large amplitude, low frequency fluctuations of the flow, or to highly
irregular, 'chaotic' flows of the kind discussed in Section 8.7.
We have to be careful not to stretch the analogy between the annulus
system and planetary atmospheres too far. One difference is the absence of
a j8-effect in the laboratory systems. To some extent, this can be simulated
by using top or bottom boundaries such that the depth d increases with
radius. This is exactly equivalent to a /?-effect for a barotropic fluid, but
only approximately so for a baroclinic system. But perhaps the most import-
ant difference is the controlling effect of boundary layers on the cylindrical
inner and outer walls in the annulus. The inner cylinder can be reduced
to small radius (such a system is sometimes called a 'dishpan'), but the
outer boundary condition is really very different from the interface with a
tropical Hadley circulation in a terrestrial type atmosphere, or perhaps
with parallel jets in the case of a Jovian-type atmosphere. Weightless
environments in spacecraft have provided an opportunity to experiment
with a truly spherical laboratory system. Electrostatic forces have been
used to provide a radially symmetric body force to replace the gravitational
force in a planetary atmosphere. But such experiments are necessarily very
expensive, and perhaps numerical experimentation offers a more convenient
way of exploring regimes of planetary circulation now that large computers
are reasonably readily available to atmospheric scientists.
The scientific study of global circulations presents peculiar difficulties
since the number of natural systems which can be observed to check our
theoretical predictions is limited. Numerical models offer the chance to carry
out controlled and detailed experiments. But laboratory experiments provide
another independent way of testing hypotheses. This is always going to be a
stern and challenging task which is likely to lead to those unexpected results
which make any science a continuous adventure into the unknown.