10.2 Terrestrial circulations 357
terrestrial. The diagram simply shows the zonal mean wind,
[u],
for each
run. The zero rotation rate run shows virtually no systematic zonal flow,
as one would expect. The low rotation rate runs have a strong jet at the
poleward edge of a Hadley cell which extends to very high latitudes. Around
the terrestrial rotation rates, the familiar pattern of a subtropical jet and a
weaker high latitude jet begins to appear. At higher rotation rates, the zonal
flow becomes quite weak, consistent with thermal wind balance. But several
midlatitude jets, each with its own associated maximum of eddy activity,
are present at midlatitudes. At the highest rotation rates, a strong westerly
equatorial jet dominates the flow. Such a pattern is more reminiscent of the
gas giants than the terrestrial planets, and suggests that the variations of
rotation rate might be the most important difference between terrestrial and
Jovian regimes. This is a contentious view which will be discussed further in
Section 10.4.
A sharp reminder of how misleading a parametrization of baroclinic
eddies in terms of Eady (or Charney) type baroclinic instability might be is
provided by a final example. Illustrated in Fig. 10.5 are two contrasting runs
with the simple global circulation model introduced in Section 2.5. Both
runs are for identical radiative equilibrium conditions, designed to simulate
the terrestrial winter circulation moderately faithfully, and for identical
planetary properties, with one exception. The difference is that the first run
has a realistic frictional spin-up time of about five days, while the second
has a very long spin up time of 1250 days. The effect on the eddies is
dramatic. In the low surface friction case, there are virtually no eddies, and
the temperature field is essentially the radiative equilibrium field. The high
friction case has active eddies, and a thermal structure which is consistent
with the simple model illustrated in Fig. 10.2. The surface winds in the high
friction case are small, but in the low friction run they are very large, and
the horizontal wind shears are large. It is this latter feature which causes
the Eady parametrization to break down. The Eady model includes no
horizontal variation of
[u];
its inclusion leads to an intractable, nonseparable
problem. Numerical solutions of the linear baroclinic instability problem
with large horizontal shears show that such shears reduce the growth rate of
unstable waves, primarily by restricting their structure so that they cannot
tap the available potential energy effectively.
The last result emphasizes the very important role that the upper and lower
boundaries play in the baroclinic instability process. The Eady and Charney
models both depend upon the presence of rigid boundaries to support
instability. Even for 'internal baroclinic instability' in which a change of sign
of the potential vorticity gradient at some level makes instability possible,