380 8 Theory: Periodic Electronic Structure Calculations
other sub - layer. Finally, the terminal oxygen is bonded to only one Mo atom,
forming the shortest Mo
–
O bond in the system (1.67 Å ). The crystal unit cell is
orthorhombic, with parameters a = 3.9628, b = 13.855 and c = 3 6964.Å
′
for a unit
cell containing Mo
4
O
12
[124] . The bi - layers are formed parallel to the (010) plane
with no chemical bonds between them, making this the easiest surface to
cleave.
MoO
3
is actually the fully oxidized end - member of a series of materials with
stoichiometries from MoO
2
to MoO
3
. For example, Wang and coworkers [125]
identifi ed two molybdenum sub - oxides Mo
18
O
52
and Mo
8
O
23
by means of electron
diffraction and high - resolution transmission electron microscopy ( HRTEM ) in
combination with image simulation. These are derived from MoO
3
by crystallo-
graphic shearing to accommodate the large number of oxygen vacancies. However,
the materials are related to the basic structure of MoO
3
with the Mo
18
O
52
(100)
surface built up of MoO
3
(010) terraces with MoO
3
(100) edges and MoO
3
(001) kinks
[126] . Since the unit cells of these types of materials are complex, modeling studies
have concentrated on the perfect MoO
3
(010) and its point defects as representative
of the terrace regions in the sub - stoichiometric material.
Different theoretical approaches have been used to study MoO
3
surfaces. Two
major ab initio periodic HF studies were published almost at the same time by
Papakondylis and Sautet [127] in 1996 and Cor à and coworkers [128] in 1997.
Papakondylis and Sautet used the CRYSTAL program to carry out HF - level calcula-
tions, with correlation energy estimates added using the PW91 functional with the
HF density. They showed how the structure can thought of as built up from an
MoO
3
molecule to the three - dimensional structure via a chain polymer and ribbon
based on the components of the crystallographic bi - layers. The evolution of the
band structure from the MoO
3
molecular orbitals could be followed through this
sequence. The (100) surface of MoO
3
contains penta - coordinated Mo atoms, which
are accessible Lewis acid centers. At the time automated geometry optimization
was not possible, but the interaction of adsorbed H
2
O with the fi xed surface were
optimized “ by hand ” based on the position and orientation of the molecule over
the surface. This showed that the adsorption of H
2
O molecules on these sites is
favorable but the electron transfer between the surface and adsorbate was actually
quite small.
Cor à and coworkers also used HF and the localized basis set approach of
CRYSTAL with a posteriori correlation corrections from PW91 [127] . They opti-
mized the bulk structure by systematically varying each degree of freedom inde-
pendently, starting with the weakest interaction fi rst. This is the interlayer spacing
for which they found a minimum, both at the correlated and the HF level. The
GGA method gave an underestimated interlayer spacing while HF gave an over-
estimate, consistent with the expected under - binding in GGA approaches. The fact
that minima are found at all indicates the presence of a weak attractive Coulombic
force between bi - layers since the long - range correlation responsible for van der
Waals interactions are absent in both approaches. They then analyzed the ground -
state electronic properties of MoO
3
, giving the electron density map shown in
Figure 8.26 a. Here the difference between the calculated density and that of a set