economic primacy, although to the maximum extent possible avoiding
American engagement in long-range tasks.
The issue to be thinking about is not how to go back but how to go forward. The United
States needs a second-generation alliance system. Europe and the United States can
take steps to make sure that the emerging Rapid Reaction Force
6
is precisely that part of
NATO that has been equipped and trained to fight together with the United States in out-
of-area
7
engagements.
Europeans should focus on understanding the revolutionary trends in US military
capabilities and doctrines, and plan to have a Rapid Reaction Force develop in such a
way as to intercept those capabilities in a certain number of years. This is substantially
less demanding in technological and financial terms than trying to upgrade the alliance
as a whole. Japan must find a way to cut, or at least loosen, its constitutional Gordian
knot
8
. Essential forms of future cooperation with America should be identified and ways
should be found either to design these forms to make them compatible with the
Japanese constitution or to change the constitution to help Japan and the United States
to improve their mutual security relationship.
That issue comes to its sharpest edge in terms of ballistic missile defense. Right now the
Japanese assume that their constitution bars any integrated US-Japanese defense
against ballistic missiles. That is a negative consequence, because it blocks effective
cooperation against the most dynamic part of the security threat facing Japan. There
may be ways to work around this problem; the United States and Japan should be
making it a very high priority to find them. The United States especially needs to offer an
overall idea of how to bring Asia through a period when power relations will be changing
to a new equilibrium reflecting China's rapidly growing importance. Washington should
aim to do this at least in the first instance by means other than military force.
It should work to bring about constructive change in China and
a benign regional adjustment to growing Chinese power. The goal here need not be a
formal alliance but rather region-wide interest in collective security, capable of
generating coalitions for specific purposes and possessing the means for effective joint
operations with the United States.
In both Europe and Asia, governments most friendly to America deeply believe that the
purposes of alliance now also extend to the need for collective, forward engagement
against environmental collapse and poverty. To the extent that US allies neglect to
maintain the capacity for basic collective military defense
9
, they are forgetting or
ignoring the lessons of history. But to the extent that the United States tries to minimize
its engagement with any issues other than physical security, it is failing the prime
obligation of leadership: to chart a future worthy of the aspirations of all.
The largest goals of a second-generation alliance system are no longer strictly regional,
but global. They are no longer purely military, but societal. For such purposes, the
United States is still the indispensable nation, not by custom or some version of divine
right but by clear vision and commitment.
2. Give Russian equivalents of the following words and phrases.
A long-term security requirement; to trigger; a clash over; a determination; to exceed;
to compel; to offset; a multilateral institution; to be compatible with; primacy; an
engagement; Gordian knot; to bar; a ballistic missile defense system; benign; to bring
about; an adjustment; indispensable; to base on smth.
3. Give English equivalents of the following words and phrases.
Препятствовать; превосходство; компенсировать; превышать; противоракетная
оборона; вывести; долгосрочное требование в области безопасности; вызвать;
столкновение из-за чего-либо; незаменимый; решимость; корректировка
(приспособление); принуждать; вовлечение; благоприятный; вызывать (быть
причиной); совместимый с; Гордиев узел; строить/основывать на чем-либо.
4. Read the article again and answer the questions using the active vocabulary.
1. What is the US global strategy based on during and right after the Cold War?
2. Does the current alliance system get stronger?
3. What do Japanese experts fear?
4. What are Japanese experts deeply concerned about?
5. What do Japanese experts worry about?