7.3 Entrainment 245
straight line connecting the sounding data for cloud-top and cloud-base levels. The
schematic of the cloud indicates that parcels passing through flight level in this
case must be either undiluted parcels from cloud top or cloud base, parcels origi-
nating at cloud top but mixing with a parcel from cloud base at some time before
reaching flight level, or parcels originating at cloud base but mixing with a parcel
from cloud top before reaching flight level. Data from a real case exhibiting a
mixing line of this type are shown in Fig. 7.16. Such cases indicate that, at least on
some occasions, vertical entrainment and mixing can be a dominant process. This
picture is a clear departure from the traditional notions of lateral entrainment.
On other occasions, the aircraft data fall close to a straight line between the
cloud-base point and a particular level below cloud top and near flight level. The
situation resulting in such a mixing line is illustrated by the schematic in Fig. 7.17,
and a real example of this type of mixing line is shown in Fig. 7.18. As shown in
the schematic, parcels mix in various fractions, with entrained environmental air
from near flight level, lose their buoyancy, and come to rest near this level. Of
course, some parcels, by chance, come to rest at other levels. Some parcels never
encounter any entrained air.
It
is these undiluted parcels that determine the height
of the cloud top. This conceptual model thus resolves one of the major dilemmas
of the traditional continuous-entrainment
ideas-it
allows for the average liquid
water content at a particular level in a cloud to be far from undiluted even though
the cloud top
is high, since the cloud-top height is determined by the maximal
ascent
of
only the least diluted parcels.
The model in Fig. 7.17 is essentially a modification of the old bubble model
discussed in Sec. 7.3.2. Just as in the bubble model, the parcels which form the
cloud towers defining the very top of the cumulus arrive there without entraining
environmental air. The new model, however, differs from the old one in that those
parcels that do not ascend to cloud top have their upward journey truncated by
entrainment rather than by erosion.
Another type of observation obtained by aircraft is illustrated schematically in
Fig. 7.19 and by a real example in Fig. 7.20.
In this case, the data show a lot of
scatter, indicating that the parcels at flight level are mixtures of cloud-base air
with environmental air entrained from a multiplicity of altitudes. Again, cloud top
would be determined by the rise of the few undiluted or nearly undiluted parcels.
Of course, the possibility exists that the parcels could undergo more than one
entrainment
event-as
used in the above analysis of the drop size spectrum.
However, it has been shown that a good reproduction of observations can be
obtained by considering a cumulus cloud to consist of a collection of parcels that
each undergo mixing with entrained air at one and only one level.
186 As illustrated
in Fig. 7.21, equal parcels are considered to be released from cloud base to several
discrete levels above. Upon reaching its designated level, each parcel is split into
several subparcels, each mixing with a different fraction of environmental air.
Each subparcel then rises or sinks to its level of neutral buoyancy, where it is
detrained to the environment. This simple model of discontinuous, inhomoge-
186 See Raymond and Blyth (1986).