
Interpreting the Within-Subjects F
Interpret the above the same way that you would a between-subjects . Because
in the above example is not larger than , it is not significant. Thus, we do not
have evidence that the means from at least two levels of type of dress represent differ-
ent populations of scores. Had been significant, it would indicate that at least two
of the level means differ significantly. Then, for post hoc comparisons, graphing, eta
squared, and confidence intervals, follow the procedures discussed in Chapter 13. How-
ever, in any of those formulas, in place of the term use .
Note: The related-samples t-test in Chapter 12 is more powerful than the independent-
samples -test because the variability in the scores is less. For the same reason, a within-
subjects ANOVA is more powerful than a between-subjects ANOVA for the same data.
Application Questions
(Answers for odd-numbered questions are in Appendix D.)
1. You read in a research report that the repeated-measures factor for a person’s
weight gain led to a decrease in his or her mood. (a) What does this tell you about
the design? (b) What does it tell you about the results?
2. Which of these relationships suggest using a repeated-measures design? (a) Exam-
ining the improvement in language ability as children grow older (b) Measuring
participants’ reaction when the experimenter surprises them by unexpectedly
shouting, under three levels of volume of shouting (c) Comparing the dating strate-
gies of males and females (d) Comparing memory ability under the conditions of
participants’ consuming different amounts of alcoholic beverages.
3. We study the influence of practice on performing a task requiring eye–hand
coordination. We test people with no practice, after 1 hour of practice, and after
2 hours of practice. In the following data, higher scores indicate better
performance. (a) What are and ? (b) Complete the ANOVA summary table.
(c) With , what do you conclude about ? (d) Perform the appropriate
post hoc comparisons. (e) What is the effect size in this study? (f) What should you
conclude about this relationship?
Amount of Practice
Subjects None 1 Hour 2 Hours
1 43 6
2 35 5
3 14 3
4 34 6
5 15 6
6 26 7
7 24 5
8 13 8
F
obt
␣ 5 .05
H
a
H
0
t
MS
A3subs
MS
wn
F
obt
F
crit
F
obt
F
obt
F
obt
390 APPENDIX A / Additional Statistical Formulas