Field Measurements of Atmospheric Composition 21
(g) Spatial resolution is one of the most important criteria, again because of the widely
differing atmospheric lifetimes and hence spatial variability away from source. If one
is interested in understanding the formation and destruction of the OH radical, for
comparison with a constrained box-model, then ideally all the sources and sinks
should be measured as close to the OH instrument inlet as possible. If, however, the
aim is to compare with the calculations of a global CTM, with a grid-square size
of 100km ×100 km, then a measurement representative of the average within that
footprint is required, perhaps provided from a satellite or a remote sensing device, a
mobile laboratory or aircraft, or a network of ground-based sensors. The two major
classes of methods are in situ and remote sensing, the former sampling from a single
point in the atmosphere (normally an inlet but this could be a small volume defined
by a folded optical path), the latter normally using a distant source of light, for use
in absorption spectroscopy. As a general rule, remote sensing methods have inferior
spatial resolution. In the limit, one only obtains a total column measurement of the
species of interest between the light source (e.g. the sun, or the earth’s surface for
scattered light) and the detector. However, in some cases the spatial resolution of
remote sensing methods can be very good, for example in Light Detection and Ranging
(LIDAR) methods (Section 1.5.1) when a pulsed source of light is used. Care must be
taken when comparing measurements of the same species taken with instruments that
sample with different spatial resolutions, or deciding upon the optimum dataset to
constrain a photochemical model. For example, during the NAMBLEX field campaign
(Section 1.8.2), NO
3
radicals were measured using an in situ method (broadband
cavity ring-down spectroscopy, see Chapter 3), with the instrument housed on the roof
of a container near the shore, and also by differential optical absorption spectroscopy
DOAS (Chapter 3), using a path length of 2 ×42 km, with the retro-reflector on
an offshore island, and the light source and spectrometer housed in a building on
the shore close to the CRDS instrument. At night, concentrations of NO
3
from the
DOAS instrument were considerably higher than from the CRDS instrument, but this
observation could be explained by the emission of small concentrations of NO, locally,
probably from the soil, that react quickly with NO
3
, reducing its concentration, but
which are not present over the open ocean.
(h) The method should be non-intrusive with respect to the operation of nearby instru-
ments, not blocking other inlets from the prevailing wind. The structure supporting
the instrument should also be taken into consideration. Remote sensing methods (e.g.
with lasers or other light sources) are ideal in this regard but suffer from problems
of spatial resolution.
(i) Weight, size, requirement of calibration, electrical power requirements, autonomy
(does it need to be left for months unattended?) and ease of operation (are skilled
operators always available?) are other operational criteria, and will vary mostly
according to the deployment platform.
(j) Ease of data reduction is a key criterion. Having to wait months for validated data is
a disadvantage.
(k) Is the instrument available commercially? The cost of an instrument is not just derived
from the hardware but also from the work-years of effort required in its development,
and in its upkeep and maintenance. If the running costs and requirement of a skilled
operator are taken into account, a commercial instrument may be a better long-
term solution, even if the performance in some of the other criteria is not quite as