10.3
EVALUATION
OF
DEFINITE
INTEGRALS
287
x
•
Xo
I
e
____
1
-----
Figure 10.7 The
equivalent
contour
obtained
by
"stretching"
C
u
,
the
contour
of
Figure
10.6.
The principal value of an integral can be written more compactly
if
we deform
the contour
C
u
by stretching it into that shown in Figure 10.7.
For
small enough <,
such a deformation will not change the number of singularities within the infinite
closed contour. Thus, the LHS
of
Equation(10.10) will have limits of integration
-00
+ i< and
+00
+ i<.1f we change the variable of integration to
~
= z - ie,
this integral becomes
1
00
f(~
+i<)
d~
=1
00
f(~)
d~
=1
00
f(z)
dz
-00
~
+ ie -
XQ
-00
~
- XQ + ie
-00
Z - XQ +
ie'
(10.12)
where in the last step we changed the dummy integration variable backto z. Note
that since
f is assumed to be continuous at all points on the contour, f
(~
+is)
--->
f(~)
for small <. The last integral of Equation (10.12) shows that there is no
singularity on the new x-axis; we have pushed the singnlarity down to
XQ- i<.In
otherwords, we have given the singnlarityOnthe x-axis a small negative imaginary
part. We can thus rewrite Equation (10.10) as
p 1
00
f(x)
dx = irrf(xQ) +1
00
f(x)
dx. ,
-00
x - XQ
-00
x - XQ +
lE
where x is used instead of z in the last integral because we are indeed integrating
along the new x-axis-s-assumlng that no other singnlaritiesare present in the UHP.
A similar argument, this time for the LHP, introduces a minus sign for the first
term on the RHS and for the
e term in the denominator. Therefore,
p 1
00
f(x)
dx = ±irrf(xQ) +1
00
f(x)dx.,
-00
x - xo
-00
x - XQ ± lE
(10.13)
where the plus (minus) sign refers to the
UHP
(LHP). This result is sometimes
abbreviated as
1 I
-----,--.-
=
P--
dx
Of
irr~(x
- XQ).
x
-XO±ZE
x
-XD
(10.14)