12.5 Applications of the stereographic projection 311
crystal with (001) in the centre (Fig. 12.11(b)) and rotate them until the [100]
Fe
3
C
and
[110]
α
directions (at the edge, i.e. in the plane of the projection) coincide, then we can
see, across the whole composite projection, the orientation relationships between the
crystal axes and other planes and directions. Furthermore, it may well be (and usually is)
the case that the zones we observe in our electron diffraction patterns of the two phases
may well be those out of the plane of projection and we may check the occurrence of
the orientation relationship by a trial-and-error process of tracing round great circles in
the composite projection and seeing whether or not the plane normals of the two phases
occur at the observed angles to each other. The diffraction pattern in Fig. 11.5 provides
a very simple example. The cube–cube orientation relationship is simply represented
by two cubic stereograms in the ‘standard’ orientation with the x, y and z axes parallel
and with the added proviso that for α-Fe (bcc) the planes which reflect are those for
which h + k + l is even and for Fe
2
TiSi (fcc), h, k, l are all odd or all even. The angles
between the two sets of planes may be checked by tracing round the great circles with
the common [0
¯
11] zone axis.
1
12.5.3 Representation of preferred orientation (texture or fabric)
Pole figures (see Section 10.4), are in effect stereographic ‘contour maps’, the posi-
tions of the ‘hills’ or ‘peaks’ in the maps showing the orientations of a particular set of
crystal planes and the ‘height’ and ‘steepness’ of the hills showing the extent or degree
of preferred orientation from a random distribution. In materials science the plane of
projection is normally set parallel to the surface of the metal sheet, in Earth science it is
normally set horizontal with the points of the compass around the edge.
The geometry of pole figures is best understood by way of a simple example. Let us
suppose that in a rolled sheet of a polycrystalline cubic metal the {100}planes of all the
crystallites lie closely, but not perfectly, parallel to the sheet surface and that the
100
directions lie closely parallel to the rolling direction (this texture, incidentally, occurs in
rolled and recrystallised sheets of iron–silicon alloys used for transformer cores). The
pole figure for the {100} planes will appear as shown in Fig. 12.14(a)—the {100} plane
normals cluster at the centre (i.e. normal to the sheet surface) and also along the rolling
and transverse directions giving contoured ‘peaks’ in these positions as shown. Now
suppose that the crystallites still remain aligned such that the
100
directions lie closely
parallel to the rolling direction but that the {100} planes are more randomly orientated
with respectto thesurfaceof thesheet. Thepole figurewill appear asin Fig. 12.14(b)—the
contour lines representing the distribution of the {100}plane normals are now spread out
towards the transverse directions. This pole figure corresponds closely to that for graphi-
tized carbon tapes (Fig. 10.13(b)) which shows the orientations of the graphite layers.
Pole figures may be prepared for any set of planes. For example the {111} pole figure
corresponding to the texture shown in Fig. 12.14(b) would consist of peaks of intensity as
1
A more detailed description of the use of stereographic projections in the analysis of orientation relation-
ships, with step-by-step examples, may be found in my article on Stereographic Techniques, Module 9.17 in
Procedures in Electron Microscopy (eds A. W. Robards and A. J. Wilson), John Wiley, 1993.