408 12.1 Methods to manipulate the drive drain
0 2 4 6 8 Ȝ 10
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0
c
kl
, c
M
c
M
1/500
1/250
1/200
1/150
1/100
f = 1/50
0 2 4 6 8 Ȝ 10
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0
c
kl
, c
M
c
M
1/500
1/250
1/200
1/150
1/100
f = 1/50
Fig. 12-11 Operating points on c
M
(
O
-curve of the rotor depending on the flap size;
parameter f = c
D.flap
· A
flap
/A
rotor
After plotting the curve c
M.fl
(
O
) =
O
2
f into the c
M
-O diagram, Fig. 12-11, the in-
tersection of this curve and c
M
(
O
) gives the operating point of the system ‘wind
turbine with deployed flaps. Turbines with a high tip speed ratio require only
small flap areas: for a wind turbine with a design tip speed ratio of
O
D
= 7, the
idling tip speed ratio would be reduced from
O
idle
= 13 to approximately 6.5, pro-
vided that the area of the deployed flaps is 1/500 of the rotor area. In contrast to
that, turbines with a low tip speed ratio require very large flap areas: a spoiler
brake is not suitable for this.
The most elegant and accurate method of aerodynamically influencing the rotor
is provided by a blade pitching system. There are two alternatives to be distin-
guished:
- Reducing the angle of attack
D
A
(pitching to feather, i.e. nose into
the wind, resp. trailing edge out of the wind) by increasing the blade
pitch angle
J
, Fig. 12-12, and
- Increasing the angle of attack
D
A
(pitch to stall, i.e. nose out of the
wind, resp. trailing edge into the wind) by reducing the blade pitch
angle
J
, Figs. 12-13.
If at constant wind speed, Fig. 12-12 top, the pitch angle is increased, the angle of
attack at a blade section is reduced from the point of optimum flow conditions to
smaller angles of attack. Therefore, the lift is reduced - and consequently the
power output since the driving circumferential component of the lift, which wants
to accelerate the rotor, gets smaller. In Fig. 12-12, bottom, the influence of the
blade pitch angle on the power coefficient curve c
P
(
O
) is shown. The rotor char-