534 16.6 Operation and maintenance
The main choice for shore connection is either AC or DC transmission. AC trans-
mission involves high dielectric losses (the isolation material acts as a capacitor).
These losses are proportional to the cable length and the voltage. On the other
hand, DC transmission requires expensive converters. For short distances, AC
transmission is most cost effective. The use of DC depends on the component
costs, and usually becomes more economical at distances of 60 km. High-voltage
DC transmission systems have increasingly been used in recent years to transport
electricity from remote energy sources to the distribution grid.
With regard to power collection, the choice is once again between AC and DC.
The first two options in Fig. 16-11, (Ia and Ib) are the ones commonly used for
both onshore and offshore farms. Option II can be found rarely and only onshore.
Option III, which combines an AC coupling of the wind turbines with a DC con-
nection to shore, may cause stability problems in the 'AC island'. The pure DC
technology system in Option IV is elegant, but practical only if reasonably priced
equipment for direct DC voltage transformation becomes available.
Although the sea seems to offer infinite space, wind farm layout still needs to
be carefully considered. Shipping routes, conservation areas, visual impact and lo-
cal variations in water depth (e.g. sandbanks), restrict the area actually available
for development. Theoretically, turbine spacing greater than 10 rotor diameters
(D) apart is optimal when only cable lengths and wind farm losses are taken into
consideration. In practice, however, spacing is only slightly wider than on land: 6
to 8 D in the prevailing wind direction and 4 to 6 D perpendicular to the prevailing
direction.
16.6 Operation and maintenance
The operation and maintenance requirements are crucially important in the context
of the overall cost effectiveness of offshore wind energy. Poor performance and
low availability can jeopardise an offshore wind farm. Two factors that distinguish
offshore sites from onshore sites are the reduced accessibility during bad weather
conditions (resulting from unfavourable waves, winds, visibility and sea ice) and
the costs of transport or lifting operations.
The demonstration offshore wind farms in sheltered waters have availability
rates that approach those of onshore sites. Unfortunately, this positive data is not
representative of real offshore conditions. Therefore in the scope of the Opti-
OWECS project the operational and maintenance scenarios for large wind farms at
remote offshore sites were analysed by Monte-Carlo simulations that took random
failures and weather conditions into account [5, 6]. Although the analysis was
made some years ago its results are qualitatively confirmed by the experience with
the first large offshore wind farms.