
196
Finite difference methods
lch.
8
obtained
from the
upstream
and downstream
characteristics together
with
the
boundary
conditions.
The
resultingZn equations must then be
solved
to
give
the
pairs
of
values for
the
later time required at each of
the n
nodes.
8.6.2
The
second Strelkov
method
The second Strelkov
method specifies
slightly different finite difference forms for the
partial
derivatives
in the
St
Venant Equations.
These
are
ui+
t
+t-u;-t
+l
dr*,
2Lx
*r-
dr-,
2Lx
These expressions
can be
used in the
same
way as those derived for the
waterhammer
case above.
I.7
THE PREISSMAI\N-SOGREAH
MPLICIT
SCHEME
This schleme
was developed to enable even
larger
At
values to
be used than
are
possible with
explicit
methods.
Regarding this
point
it is
worth
mentioning that,
when
very
large
river schemes
are being analysed,
the duration of the simulations
can
be
very
large. There
is, then,
a
very
strong incentive
to
use
very
large Arvalues and
implicit
methods are capable
of
handling very
large At
values
indeed. It should be
remembered
that implicit
methods cannot handle supercritical flows accurately
nor
can
they deal
with rapidly
changing boundary conditions unless the Ar
values
are
correspondingly
reduced.
However, they are extremely useful when
very long
simulated times
are to be
analysed. It is claimed that the analysis of sewer networks
is
best
done
with
implicit
methods.
This
is because,
as the
depth
increases
in a
sewer
with a circular cross-section,
the surface
breadth
diminishes,
eventually
becoming
zero
when
the
depth equals
or exceeds the sewer's diameter. As the
wave
speed
equals
VkD)
and 6 is
the ratio of
the
flow area to the
surface
breadth, the
wave
speed
becomes
infinite. In implicit
methods the wave
speed is not
involved, whereas in
characteristic
methods
the
wave
speed is a
parameter
of major importance.
So
irnplicit methods are suitable
for dealing with
analyses of this type, but it should
always be remembered
that
these methods
cannot handle supercritical
flows and
sewage
networks,
very
frequently
indeed,
experience supercritical flow conditions.
It
must
still be
remembered,
however, that
implicit
and
explicit
finite difference
methods can
pass
shocks,
i.e.
hydraulic
jumps,
and these are common in sewerage
networks. The
pros
and cons
of
using implicit
methods are
therefore
complex
and it
may
well
be thought
that,
for such complicated circumstances, the method of
Sec.8.7l
The
Preissmann-sogreah
implicit
scheme
r97
characteristics
may
have
something
to
offer.
tf
this
method
is chosen,
the
tracking
of
any
hydraulic
jumps
must
be
undertaken
and
supercritical
flow
sections
must
be
analysed
approPriatelY.
E.?;l
Ttre
Preissman
implicit
scieme
The
discretization
of
the
-dependent
variables
and
their
derivatives
as
suggested
by
Preissman
are
given below:
f,.i
:|{f,*r,,
*,
+
f,,i).
ry
(f,*
r'i
*
f,,i)'
{.:"-*+(1-q*'
ll
-f,*r,i*r-
fr*r,i
*
f
,,,*t-
ft,'
Ot
ZLt
0 is
a
weighting
eoefficient
which
must
lie
between
zero
and
unity'
Each
of
the
dependent
variables
in
the
continuity
and
dynamic
equations
together
with
its
associated
derivatives
can
now
be
replaced
T
th9
appropriate
eq"uation
by
one
of
the
expressions
just
specified,/b9ing
replaced
by
the
dependent
nuriubl"
und",
consideration.
Reduction
of
the
resulting
expressions
and
substitut-
ing
f
:
'l-,2,3,
4,
. .
.
glves a system
of
implicit
equations
which
together
with
end
characteristics
and
boindary
conditions
cin
be solved
for
depth
and
flow
at
each
node
along
the
reach.
The
system
is always
stable
if_0
is chosen
to
lie between
0.5
and
L.0
and
isilways
unstable
when
0
is
lesithan
0.5.
When
0
is
between
0-5
and
0'55,
parasitic
oscillations
have
been
reported
but
these
only
occut
il-
+9
absence
of
hction.
By
using
larger
values
of
0
-
greater
than
0.66
-
artificial
damping
is
introduced;
so
tf,e
rJcommended
procedure
is
to
use
0
=
0'5
when
there
are
significant
resistance
terms
prereni
and
0
=
0.6
or
larger
for
less
frictional
circumstances.
For
further
details
of explicit
and
implicit
methods
the
reader
is
referred
to
the
book
(lnsteady
flow
in
open
channels
edited
by
K. Mahmood
and
V'
Yevjevisch
published
by
lVater
Resources
Publications,
PO
Box
303,
Fort
Cottins,
Colorado
'1OSZZ,USA.
The
Lax
Wendroff,
StrelkoV
methods
and
the
Preissmenn
method
all
use
i to
denote
spatial
location
and
j
to
denote
timewise
location
whereas
the
I-eap
Frog
method
,ei"rs"s
this
practicl.
ttris
follows
the
practice
employed
in
the
sources.
0u
0.r
ad
ar-
+l
0r
Lt