of the indicated product vector space into the scalar field R: Because of the
universality of the canonical mapping / of this product vector space onto V
r;s
as
considered for two factors after (4.1), one has the following isomorphism:
V
r; s
is canonically isomorphic to the vector space of all ðr þ sÞ-linear mappings
of V
V
V V ððr þ sÞfactorsÞ into R:
There are simple variants of that proposition. For instance, there is a canonical
isomorphism between V
1;s
and the s-linear mappings of VV (s factors) into
V: A symmetric (see below) tensor g 2 V
0;2
with the property gðv; vÞ0 and
gðv; vÞ¼0 iff v ¼ 0 defines a scalar product in V and hence converts a general
vector space V into a Euclidean space. Of course, all these mappings are mappings
of vector spaces and do not depend on the actually chosen base in V: In this sense,
scalars, vectors and tensors are called invariant and contra- and covariant,
respectively, entities.
For s ¼ r; one may also consider (4.11) as a bilinear mapping V
0;r
V
r; 0
! R:
It is easily seen that every bilinear mapping of these spaces into R has the form
(4.11), hence the two spaces are dual to each other:
V
0;r
¼ðV
r;0
Þ
: ð4:12Þ
For r ¼ 1; this is just the duality of V and V
; and, if V is a Euclidean space so that
V
is identified with V; then the mapping is the scalar product.
Next, consider mappings of V into another vector space V
0
: By duality, a
homomorphism H from V to V
0
induces a homomorphism H
from V
0
to V
:
hw
0
; Hvi¼hH
w
0
; vi; v 2 V; w
0
2 V
0
: (Recall that a finite-dimensional vector
space is reflexive. Given bases in V and V
0
; H is represented by a matrix, and H
by its transposed.) If V and V
0
are isomorphic, so are V
and V
0
; and there is also
an isomorphic mapping from V
onto V
0
which is H
1
: Let
~
H : TðVÞ!TðV
0
Þ
be an isomorphism which in case of decomposable tensors acts like H on each
vector factor and like H
1
on each covector factor. It is easily seen that
~
H
commutes with contractions, if it acts on V
0;0
¼ R as the identity mapping
(exercise). The following statement is now rather obvious:
There is a canonical one–one mapping between isomorphisms from V to V
0
and
isomorphisms from TðVÞ to TðV
0
Þ which preserve the degree and commute with
tensor contraction. In particular, the automorphism group of V is isomorphic to
the automorphism group of TðVÞ:
The automorphisms of a vector space are also called (regular) transforma-
tions. By the canonical isomorphism between V
1;1
and the space of linear map-
pings (endomorphisms) of V into V (see top of this page) there is a one–one
correspondence of tensors a of degree (1,1) with components given by regular
matrices and automorphisms A of V: These tensors are called transformation
tensors. Sometimes these transformations, which transform a given vector v 2 V in
general in a different one v
0
¼ Av; in components related to a fixed base v
0
i
¼ a
i
j
v
j
;
are called ‘active coordinate transformations’ while ordinary coordinate
100 4 Tensor Fields