data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aec52/aec52e9bc70bc0570479cda8015b7788a3a61a87" alt=""
17 Photoionization spectrum of diphenylamine
147
phenyl torsion is a totally symmetric normal mode and so there is no vibrational selection
rule, i.e. v can take any value in the S
1
–S
0
transition.
A number of conclusions can be drawn from inspection of Figure 17.3.First, the vibra-
tional structure is dominated by a progression in a single mode, as is especially evident for
photoionization from v
= 0. The vibrational interval is rather small, about 53 cm
−1
, and
therefore a low frequency vibration in the cation is responsible. The phenyl torsion would
be expected to be a low-frequency mode, since it involves the twisting of two relatively
heavy phenyl groups, and is therefore the likely candidate for the progressions. In fact it
is possible to discern a small contribution from another active mode, with a frequency of
∼400 cm
−1
,which is most noticeable in the spectrum for photoionization from v
= 2.
However, this additional active mode will be ignored since it gives only very weak features.
The vibrational numbering for the torsional mode in the ion is given at the top of
Figure 17.3 and applies to all three spectra. How was this numbering arrived at? It is
not always easy to establish the vibrational numbering in an electronic spectrum by simple
inspection, since it is not unusual to find that the early members of a progression are too
weak to observe. Consider the bottom trace in Figure 17.3,which is the spectrum for pho-
toionization via v
=0inthe S
1
state. The most intense band clearly corresponds to v
ion
0,
which reveals that there is a substantial change in the torsion angle in moving from S
1
to
the ground electronic state of the cation. It is not obvious that the very weak peak attributed
to v
ion
= 0, which is barely perceptible above the background noise, is correctly assigned.
However, confirmation is provided by the middle and top spectra in Figure 17.3,where the
observed band at lowest wavenumber is the same for these spectra. The first band becomes
much stronger for excitation through v
= 1 and v
= 2 and yet no additional band appears
at lower wavenumber, proving conclusively that the first band corresponds to v
ion
= 0.
The different intensity distributions in the three spectra are rather interesting and can
be explained by employing the quantum mechanical form of the Franck–Condon principle.
This states that the transition probability for a particular member of a vibrational progression
is proportional to the square of the vibrational overlap integral for the two electronic states
involved in the electronic transition (see Section 7.2.2). Key to interpreting the intensity
distributions is to recognize that the long progression in the torsional mode indicates a
substantial change in the torsional angle φ on excitation from S
1
to the ground electronic
state of the ion. This is represented in Figure 17.4 by a displacement of potential energy
curves for these two states. Consequently, to explain the intensity profiles it is only necessary
to consider those parts of the vibrational wavefunctions where significant overlap is possible.
This region is marked on Figure 17.4 by the dashed vertical lines for the specific case
of transitions out of v
= 1, and corresponds to the full spatial extent of the lower state
vibrational wavefunction, ψ
v
=1
.
Projecting ψ
v
=1
vertically upwards, overlap with the ion vibrational wavefunction
improves from v
ion
= 0 → 2. Thereafter the overlap decreases because of cancellation
of regions of positive and negative overlap. This is specifically illustrated in the inset of
Figure 17.4 in the lower right corner, which brings together the wavefunctions for v
= 1
and v
ion
= 5. The peak of the wavefunction for v
ion
= 5 lies almost directly above the node
for v
= 1. As usual in integration, a definite integral evaluated between the limits a and c