1270 Part G Applications
section is usually adopted from an empirical formula
that is normalized so that
σ
i
j
(E) =
(E−I
j
)/2
0
dσ
i
j
(E)
dW
s
dW
s
, (84.38)
where σ
i
j
(E) is the total ionization cross section at pri-
mary electron energy E. One formula in common use is
that employed by Opal et al. [84.42]tofittotheirdata:
dσ
i
j
(E)
dW
s
=
A(E)
1+
W
s
/W
2.1
, (84.39)
where A(E) is a normalization factor and W is an em-
pirically determined constant, which has been found to
be equal to within a factor of about 50% to the ionization
potential for a number of species.
For energy loss due to elastic scattering by thermal
electrons, an analytic form of the loss function such as
that proposed by Swartz et al. [84.43] may be used:
L
e
(E) =
3.37×10
−12
E
0.94
n
0.03
e
E −k
B
T
e
E −0.53k
B
T
e
2.36
,
(84.40)
where T
e
is the electron temperature and n
e
is the number
density of ambient thermal electrons.
For high energy auroral electrons, the rate of energy
loss per electron per unit distance over the path s of the
electrons in the atmosphere can be estimated using the
continuous slowing down approximation (CSDA)as
−
dE
ds
=
j
n
j
(z)L
j
(E) sec θ +n
e
(z)L
e
(E) sec θ,
(84.41)
where θ is the angle between the path of the primary
electron s and the local vertical. In the CSDA, all the
electrons of a given energy are assumed to lose their
energy continuously and at the same rate. The rate of
energy loss (−dE/ ds) is integrated numerically over
the path of the electron, which degrades in energy un-
til it is thermalized. In this approximation, inelastic
processes are assumed always to scatter the electrons
forward, so cross sections that are differential in angle
are not required. Because electrons actually lose energy
at different rates, however, and because elastic and in-
elastic scattering processes do change the direction of
the electrons, the CSDA gives an estimate for the rates
of electron energy loss processes that is increasingly
inaccurate as the energy of the electron decreases.
In practice, discrete energy loss of electrons can
be easily treated numerically if the local energy loss
approximation is valid. The spectrum of electrons is di-
vided into energy bins that are smaller than the energy
losses for the processes, and the integrals in (84.35, 36)
are replaced by sums over energy bins. Since elastic
scattering of electrons by neutrals changes mostly the
direction of the incident electron, and not its energy,
only inelastic processes need be considered. In order to
compute excitation and dissociation rates, only integral
cross sections are required; the scattering angle is unim-
portant. For ionization, of course, the energy distribution
of the secondary electrons must be considered, but not
the scattering angles of either the primary or secondary
electrons. Below the lowest thresholds for excitations,
energetic electrons lose their energy in elastic collisions
with thermal electrons. The process of energy loss to
thermal electrons is often approximated as continuous,
rather than discrete.
The collision frequency ν
k
j
for a discrete electron-
impact excitation process k of a species j is given by
ν
k
j
(E) = n
j
(z)v
e
(E)σ
k
j
(E). (84.42)
For energy loss due to elastic scattering from ther-
mal electrons, a pseudo-collision frequency ν
e
may be
defined as
ν
e
(E) =
1
∆E
−
dE
dt
,
(84.43)
where ∆E is the grid spacing in the calculation, and the
energy loss rate is
−
dE
dt
= v
e
(E)n
e
L
e
(E), (84.44)
where L
e
is taken from (84.40).
Since the energy bins should be smaller than the
typical energy loss in order to obtain accurate rates for
the excitation processes, it is often convenient to treat
rotational excitation also as a continuous process, with
a pseudo-collision frequency similar to that for elastic
scattering from ambient electrons (84.43) with
−
dE
dt
= v
e
(E)n
j
L
rot
j
(E), (84.45)
where the loss function for rotational excitation is given
by
L
rot
j
(E) =
J
η
J
j
J
σ
J,J
j
(E)W
J,J
j
. (84.46)
In this expression, η
J
j
is the fraction of molecules
jmeasured or computed cross section for electron-
impact excitation of species j from rotational state J
to rotational state J
,andW
J,J
j
is the associated energy
loss.
Part G 84.3