offensive marketing 366
IMPLICATIONS
Marketers involved in price setting should seek to understand both
through prior research and experience how price endings can be used
as a means to influence subtly a consumer’s perceptions of a product’s or
brand’s price or its attributes such as value or quality.
APPLICATION AREAS AND FURTHER READINGS
Pricing
Estelami, H. (1999). ‘The Computational Effect of Price Endings in Multi-
Dimensional Price Advertising,’ Journal of Product and Brand Management, 8(2–3),
244–256.
Gendall, P., Holdershaw, J., and Garland, R. (1997). ‘The Effect of Odd Pricing on
Demand,’ European Journal of Marketing, 31(11–12), 799–813.
Naipaul, S., and Parsa, H. G. (2001). ‘Menu Price Endings that Communicate Value
and Quality,’ Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 26–37.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Stiving, Mark, and Winer, Russell S. (1997). ‘An Empirical Analysis of Price Endings
with Scanner Data,’ Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), June, 57–67.
Gendall, Philip (1998). ‘Title: Estimating the Effect of Odd Pricing,’ Journal of Product
& Brand Management, 7(5), October, 421–432.
offensive marketing
DESCRIPTION
Marketing focused on attacking, directly or indirectly, the strategic positions
of any number of a firm’s competitors.
KEY INSIGHTS
In adopting an offensive marketing approach, a firm may use any num-
ber of ‘attack’ or ‘assault’ strategies to strengthen its own position
and weaken the positions of its current or future competitors in the
marketplace. In some situations, offensive marketing may be used to
challenge a firm which is either dominant or which has greater domi-
nance in the marketplace. In this context, examples of offensive market-
ing approaches—where each is based on a military analogy—include: a
‘frontal attack,’ where the firm matches the dominant firm’s marketing
in some area (e.g. pricing, product features, or promotions); a ‘flanking
assault,’ where the firm pits its strengths against a competitor’s identi-
fied weaknesses (e.g. entering a geographic market where the competi-
tor’s presence is very limited); an ‘encirclement attack,’ where the firm
pursues a multi-pronged onslaught against the competitor to dilute its
resources (e.g. introducing numerous new product lines to overwhelm
the competitor’s ability to respond in any one area); a ‘bypass attack,’
where the firm pursues markets where the competitor is absent (e.g.
diversifying into an unrelated product market), and ‘guerrilla warfare,’
where the firm engages in a series of small intermittent attacks on
the competitor’s position in an effort to disorient the competitor and
ultimately obtain some kind of concession from the competitor (e.g. using
public relationships campaigns to put a market-monopolizing competitor