84 Anthropogenic emissions of aerosols and gases
persistent over a 24-hour period then the net effect would be a 5–6
C cooling of
surface temperatures. This result, however, depends on the latitude and length of
day, and the optical thickness of the cloud. Warming is the net effect for shorter
days and higher latitudes and optically thin contrails. But contrails typically last
only 2–6 hours and moreover, most of the jet aircraft traffic is during the day.
So the major impact of contrail cirrus would be a cooling response. Moreover,
as discussed by Sassen (1997) the sign of the climatic impact of contrails is
a function of the particle size, with clouds containing relatively small particles
increasing reflectance and those with larger particles trapping terrestrial radiation.
As noted by Khvorostyanov and Sassen (1998) contrails differ in structure from
natural cirrus clouds since they are composed mainly of very small ice crystals,
especially early in their lifetimes. Thus modeling studies of their potential impacts
treating them as being similar to ordinary cirrus and concluding that they lead to
surface warming (Liou et al., 1991; Schumann, 1994) may be in error.
Changnon (1981a) performed a climatological analysis of cloudiness, sunshine,
and surface temperatures over the midwestern United States during the period
1901–1977. He found that in the period since 1960, there was more cloud cover
and a decrease in sunshine, and that surface temperature extremes were moderated
(less extreme minimum and maximum monthly averages), especially in the area
of the midwest where jet traffic is greatest. In a study of sky cover over the
United States, Seaver and Lee (1987) found a decrease in cloudless days over
large regions of the United States since 1936. The results are consistent with
the hypothesis that increased contrail formation led to the changes, but natural
fluctuations in climate trends cannot be ruled out.
It has also been proposed that contrails can seed lower-level clouds with ice
crystals and thereby enhance surface precipitation (Murcray, 1970). Natural cirrus
ice crystals are known to survive long fall distances and potentially seed lower-
level clouds (Braham and Spyers-Duran, 1967). Whether or not contrail crystals,
which are smaller than natural cirrus crystals, can survive falling through great
depths of the troposphere is not known. If, indeed, high concentrations of contrail
crystals can survive descent into low-level, water-rich clouds such as orographic
clouds and frontal clouds, they could seed those clouds with ice crystals and
enhance surface precipitation in a “seeder–feeder” type process (e.g., Bergeron,
1965; Browning et al., 1975; Hobbs et al., 1980; see Cotton, 1990 for a review
of the “seeder–feeder” process). This hypothesis has not been supported by any
further studies, however.
In summary, contrails have the potential of altering regional and possibly even
global climate if they become extensive enough. Their biggest potential impact
is on moderating surface temperature extremes (i.e., maximum and minimum
temperatures). It is also possible that they could impact daily average surface