Betz J, Mackay K, Peuzin J, Halstrup B, Lhermet N 1996
Torsion based, drift free magnetostrictive microactuator. In:
Proc. Actuator ’96. Axon Technology Consult GmbH,
Bremen, Germany, pp. 283–6
Claeyssen F, Boucher D, Pohlenz C 1988 Application of mag-
netostrictive rare earth iron alloys to sonar transducers. In:
Proc. Undersea Defence Technology ’88. Microwave Exh. and
Pub. Ltd. Ed, London, 711pp
Clark A E 1980 Magnetostrictive rare earth—Fe
2
compounds.
In: Wohlfarth E P (ed.) Ferromagnetic Materials. North
Holland, Amsterdam
Clark A E 1986 Magnetostriction in twinned [112] crystals of
Tb
0.27
Dy
0
.
73
Fe
2
. IEEE Trans. Magn MAG-22, 973–5
du Tremolet de Lacheisserie E 1993 Magnetostriction. Theory
and Applications of Magnetoelasticity. CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL
du Tremolet de Lacheisserie E, Mackay K, Betz J, Peuzin J C
1998 From bulk to film magnetostrictive actuators. J. Alloy.
Comp. 685–91
du Tremolet de Lacheisserie E, Peuzin J C 1994 Magnetostric-
tion and internal stresses in thin films: the cantilever method
revisited. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 136, 189–96
Duc N H, Mackay K, Betz J, Givord D 1996 Giant magne-
tostriction in amorphous (Tb
x
Dy
1–x
)(Fe
0.45
Co
0.55
)
y
films.
J. Appl. Phys. 79, 973–7
Garnier A, Bourouina T, Fujita H, Hiramoto T, Orsier E,
Peuzin J C 1999 Magnetic actuation of bending and torsional
vibrations for 2D-optical-scanner application. In: Proc. 10th
Int. Conf. on Solid State Sensors and Actuators. Sendai, Japan
Kavesh S 1977 In: Leany H S, Gilman J J (eds.) Metallic glass-
es. American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH
Klokholm E 1976 The measurement of magnetostriction in
ferromagnetic thin films. IEEE Trans. Magn. 12, 819–21
Nye J F 1957 Physical Properties of Crystals. Clarendon Press,
Oxford
Quandt E 1997 Giant magnetostrictive thin film materials and
applications. J. Alloy. Comp. 258, 126–32
Quandt E, Gerlach B, Seemann K 1994 Preparation and ap-
plications of magnetostrictive thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 76,
7000–2
von Aulock W 1965 Handbook of Microwave Ferrite Materials.
Academic Press, New York
J. C. Peuzin
Laboratoire Louis Ne
´
el, CNRS Grenoble, France
Magnets, Soft and Hard: Magnetic
Domains
Below the Curie temperature, the elementary mag-
netic moments of ferro- and ferrimagnetic materials
are spontaneously ordered (see Magnetism in Solids:
General Introduction). On a mesoscopic scale in the
nanometer range, many of these elementary dipoles
can be collected in an average value called magnet-
ization, which is represented by a classical vector
M(r) of unit A/m (r is the position vector). The ab-
solute value of the magnetization vector, given by the
saturation magnetization M
s
, is a function of tem-
perature alone for all regular magnetic materials, it is
constant throughout a (chemically uniform) sample
and is largely independent of applied magnetic fields.
We can therefore write M(r) ¼M
s
m(r) with m
2
¼1,
where m(r) is the unit vector field of magnetization.
For samples of finite dimensions, this vector field is
usually subdivided into magnetic domains, i.e., vol-
umes that are themselves uniformly magnetized to a
value equal to M
s
along different directions. They are
separated by domain walls, in which the magnetiza-
tion vector continuously rotates on the 10–1000 nm
scale to accommodate the change in magnetization
orientation between adjacent domains. Domain for-
mation is driven by energy minimization, with the
reduction of the stray field energy being responsible
for their development above all. The character of a
domain pattern depends on the strength and orien-
tation of ‘‘easy axes of magnetization’’ (anisotropy,
see also Magnetic Anisotropy) relative to the main
surfaces of the magnet, but also its shape, dimen-
sions, and physical microstructure are important.
The magnetic microstructure, i.e., the arrangement
of domains and walls, together with their reaction in
external magnetic fields (magnetization processes)
determine the macroscopic properties of magnetic
materials. Due to the presence of domains, a magnet
can accommodate a continuous range of magnetic
states that reach from complete demagnetization (if
the moments of all domains cancel each other) to
saturation in external fields. In soft magnetic materi-
als, the magnetic microstructure can easily be mod-
ified in small fields either by wall motion or
magnetization rotation.
For instance, a high permeability in the core of
inductive devices is provided by easily displaceable
domain walls leading to a steep magnetization curve,
whereas a linear curve for sensor applications re-
quires rotation processes mainly. If major and irre-
versible rearrangements of domains occur during
magnetization, they are responsible for losses and
noise in devices, and pinning of domain walls by
material imperfections results in hysteresis with co-
ercivity and remanence (see Magnetic Hysteresis).
Strong pinning or the prevention of domain nuclea-
tion causes a high coercivity and leads to hard mag-
netic materials (see Hard Magnetic Materials, Basic
Principles of ).
In Sects. 2 and 3 of this contribution, the basic
domain structures in both material classes will be re-
viewed based on Kerr-microscopical domain studies
(see Kerr Microscopy ), following some introductory
remarks on the fundamentals of domains in Sect. 1.
Reviews on magnetic materials with emphasis on
magnetic microstructure can be found in Cullity
(1972), Chikazumi (1997), and O’Handley (2000). A
comprehensive review on domains together with an
extended bibliography is given in Hubert and Scha
¨
fer
(1998).
843
Magnets, Soft and Hard: Magnetic Domains