
result in its transformation back to A. Bulk erasure
by heating the storage medium may be necessary.
Very little information about the practical operat-
ing characteristics for a two-photon re-writable sys-
tem have been given. The asymmetry between the
A-B and B-A transitions suggests that these ma-
terials may be more suited to write-once applications.
Certainly, the reliability of rewriting has not been
demonstrated. No information has been given on the
speed of either the write or read process or the timing
margin for writing.
The problem of achieving spatial and temporal co-
incidences is not trivial so more recent work (Zhang
et al. 2000) has used a single beam with variable focus
depth to achieve vertical spatial resolution on a ro-
tating disk. Data bits 3.5 3.5 20 mm
3
were record-
ed in an undefined material using a Ti:sapphire laser
on 25 layers with a 75mm layer spacing. Using a con-
tinuous 532 nm laser, a CNR of 42 dB in a bandwidth
of 1 kHz was achieved at a laser power of 5 kW cm
2
.
At 20 kW cm
2
, significant data erasure was observed
after multiple read cycles. Erasure or re-writability
were not discussed.
Clearly, while the two-photon concept is elegant,
the performance is severely hampered by available
materials. Systems may be limited to write-once
applications and are not competitive with hard disks.
5. Concluding Remarks
The continued improvement in cost and performance
of magnetic hard drives poses an extremely difficult
challenge for new technologies. Lithographically pat-
terned media may offer only an incremental improve-
ment over continuous media. 2D optical technologies
face fundamental wavelength limitations and 3D con-
cepts require materials which do not yet exist. At the
present time, practical storage systems using self-
assembled media addressed with multiple probe heads
cannot be realized. However, enormous progress is
being made both in understanding the fundamental
aspects of self-assembly and in the fabrication of
complex MEMS devices. Together, they may provide
the next revolution in storage especially suited for
the miniaturization of personal computing devices
expected in the 21st century.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the NSF Materials
Research Science and Engineering Center (DMR-
9809423). The author would also like to acknowledge
valuable information on disk storage provided by T.
Howell, Quantum Corporation.
See also: Magnetic Recording: Patterned Media;
Magnetic Recording Heads: Historical Perspective
and Background; Magneto-optic Recording: Over-
write and Associated Problems; Magneto-optical
Effects, Enhancement of
Bibliography
Ashley J, Bernal M P, Burr G W, Coufal H, Guenther H,
Hoffnagle J A, Jefferson C M, Marcus B, MacFrlane R M,
Shelby R M, Sincerbox G T 2000 Holographic data storage.
IBM J. Res. Develop. 44, 341–66
Bertram H N, Williams M 2000 SNR and density limit esti-
mates: A comparison of longitudinal and perpendicular
recording. IEEE Trans. Magn. 36, 4–9
Binnig G, Despont M, Drechsler U, Ha
¨
berle W, Lutwyche M,
Vettiger P, Mamin H J, Chui S W, Kenny T W 1999 Ultra-
high-density atomic force microscopy data storage with erase
capability. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1329–31
Carley L R, Bain J A, Fedder G K, Greve D W, Guillow D F,
Lu M S C, Mukherjee T, Santhanam S, Abelnann L, Mim S
2000 Single chip computers with microelectromechanical sys-
tems-based magnetic memory. J. Appl. Phys. 87, 6680–5
Chou S Y, Wei M S, Krauss P R, Fischer P B 1994 Single
domain magnetic pillar array of 35 nm diameter and 65
Gbits/in
2
density for ultrahigh density quantum magnetic
storage. J. Appl. Phys. 75, 6673–5
Colburn M, Johnson S, Stewart M, Damle S, Bailey T, Choi B,
Wedluke M, Michaelson T, Sreenivasan S V, Willson C G
1999 Step and flash imprint lithography: A new approach to
high-resolution patterning procedures. SPIE 3676, 379–89
Cooper E B, Mamalis S R, Fang H, Dai H, Matsumoto K,
Minne S C, Hunt T, Quate C F 1999 Terabit-per-square-inch
data storage with the atomic force microscope. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 75, 3566–7
Cui B, Wu W, Kong L, Sun X, Chou S Y 1999 Perpendicular
quantized magnetic disks with 45 Gbits on a 4 4cm
2
area.
J. Appl. Phys. 85, 5534–6
Despont M, Brugger J, Dreschler U, Durig U, Haberle W,
Lutwyche M, Roithuizen H, Stutz R, Widmer R, Roher H,
Binning G K, Vettiger P 1999 VLSI-MEMS chip for AFM
data storage. IEEE Int. Micro Electro Mechanical Sys. 564–9
Devolder T, Chappert C, Chen Y, Cambril E, Bernas H, Jamet
J P, Ferr E 1999 Sub-50nm planar magnetic nanostructures
fabricated by ion irradiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 3383–5
Haginoya C, Heike S, Ishibashi M, Nakamura K, Koike K,
Yoshimura T, Yamamoto J, Hirayama Y 1999 Magnetic
nanoparticle array with perpendicular crystal magnetic
anisotropy. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 8327–31
Heinze S, Bode M, Kubetzka A, Pietzsch O, Nie X, Blu
¨
gel S,
Wiesendanger R 2000 Real-space imaging of two-dimension-
al antiferromagnetism on the atomic scale. Science 288,
1805–8
Hou S M, Zhao X Y, Yang C, Xue Z Q, Yang W J, Chen H Y
1999 Ultrahigh density data storage in an organic film with a
scanning tunneling microscope. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 17,
2467–70
Lutwyche M I, Despont M, Dreschler U, Du
¨
rig U, Ha
¨
berle w,
Rothuizen H, Stutz R, Widmer R, Binig G K, Vettiger P 2000
Highly parallel data storage system based on scanning probe
arrays. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 3299–301
Mamin H J, Ried R P, Terris B O, Rugar D 1999 High-density
data storage based on the atomic force microscope. Proc.
IEEE 87, 1014–27
Maniloff E S, Johnson A E, Mossberg T W 1999 Spectral data
storage using rare-earth doped crystals. MRS Bull. 46–50
547
Magnetic Reco rding Devices: Future Technologies