4
CHAPTER
ONE:
ness;
but
now he
had
to be careful
how he did
it,
because
the
opposition
of
parliament
could
at
any
time
bring
the
wheels
of
government
to
a
full
stop.
To
keep
them
going
he had to have
the
continuing
support
of
a
majority
in the
legislature;
and
experience
soon
demonstrated
that
the
only way
he could
carry
on
was
by
governing
through
ministers
selected
from
the
leaders
of
that
majority.
Thus without
any specific
law
requiring
it
there
is
none
to this
day
for
the
simple
reason
that none is needed
the
executive,
instead
of
being
separated
from
the
legislature,
was embedded
in
it.
Legally
the ministers
were
responsible
to the
king,
who
appointed
them
and
invested
them
with his
powers
of
government;
but
practically
the
ministers
were
responsible
to their
fellow
members
of
parliament
for
the
way they
exercised
these
powers.
In other
words,
parliament,
through
its
principal
committee,
conducted
the
government
for
the
king.
This became
more
apparent
shortly
after
George
I,
a
German
prince,
succeeded
to the British
throne in 1714.
His
predecessors
had
regularly
presided
over
the
meetings
of the
ministers,
or
cabinet,
and
so
retained
some
personal
influence.
But the
new
king
could
not
speak
English,
and
therefore
he
early
abandoned
the
practice
of
attending
cabinet
meetings.
The
precedent
he
thus established
has
never
been
broken,
not
even
by
his
great-grandson
George
III.
The
office of
prime
minister,
the
crowning
feature of the
cabinet
system,
could not
arise until the
departure
of
the
king
left
a
vacant
sfeat
at the head
of the table.
Though
one of
the ministers then
had
to
preside,
years passed
before one
came
to
dominate
his
colleagues.
That
was
Sir
Robert
Walpole,
who
really
ruled
the
land,
for he
was the
leader
of
the
legislature
and
the effective head of the executive. He
was
the
first
prime
minister and
the
last
for a
long
time.
Strange
as it
may
seem
today,
one of
the chief accusations
that
were
hurled
at
Walpole by
the
growing
opposition
in
parliament,
which
finally
forced
his
resignation
by
an adverse
vote
in
1742,
was that
he
had
made himself
"prime
and sole minister."
Equally
strange today
appears
a
charge
that he
confidently
aimed at his
attackers to
rout
them.
It was that
their
attempt
to
remove
him,
one of
the
king's
servants,
"without so
much
as
alleging
any
particular
crime
against
him/'
constituted "one of
the
greatest
encroachments ever
made on
the
prerogative
of the Crown." Here we have
the
prime
minister
openly
denouncing
in
parliament
the first essential
principle
of cabinet
government,
and
being
himself denounced for
introducing
the
second
essential!
Clearly
the new
system
of
government
was
far
from
being