Britain's Experimental Farm, 1891-1914 87
staunchly committed to the principle of the secret ballot, so they voted
out the bill.
Undaunted, the WFL increased its efforts in 1893 and collected some
30,000 signatures, representing about a quarter of all the adult women of
New Zealand, on a petition demanding the enfranchisement of women.
Even the adroit Seddon felt threatened by such overwhelming support.
He tried to appease his brewer backers and male supporters by legislating
that an absolute majority of 60 percent of votes was required before an
electorate could introduce prohibition and close its pubs. In addition, he
once again added postal voting to delay the introduction of women's fran-
chise to 1896. This time the Legislative Council called his bluff as an act
of spite, and all New Zealand women, including Maori women, won the
right to vote on September 19,
1893.
Historians have suggested several reasons why New Zealand women
got the vote before any other centralized colonial entity. Wild-West Wy-
oming granted women the vote in
1869,
Mormon-dominated Utah in 1870,
and Colorado in 1893, but New Zealand beat the state of South Australia
by a year and Australia, which federated in 1901-1902, by eight years.
The United States and Great Britain lagged
far
behind, not admitting their
adult females into the electoral process until 1919. Even then British
women had to be over 30 to vote until 1928, when the age was lowered
to 21, the same as for men.
Patricia Grimshaw argues that the newness of New Zealand and the
resulting absence of strong conservative traditions proved critical, as did
the favorable climate of opinion, the underdeveloped nature of party
politics, the highly developed organization of the WCTU and WFL, and
the drive, ability, and persuasive powers of Kate Sheppard. Raewyn
Dal-
ziel
thinks that there were also deeper causes related to the role played
by women in colonial New Zealand society. She points out that late-
nineteenth-century New Zealand women led very different kinds of lives
than their English contemporaries. Raw, frontier New Zealand had little
time for ornamental females and rather wanted useful women who could
act as partners in founding farms and businesses and raise large families
to augment the labor force. Rural papers such as the New Zealand Farmer
praised tireless homemakers who acted as a combination of laborer, do-
mestic servant, and child-producing machine and bestowed high status
upon women as result. Michele Knauf suggests that this elevation of
women's status contrasts somewhat with Australia, where the family farm
was not as central to colonial life. In addition, the work of Anne Summers
and Miriam Dixon suggests that Australian men tended to stereotype their