356 Questions and answers
4. Deduce as much as you can about the space groups
of the compounds for which the following data were
obtained.
Systematic absences for general reflections give the unit
cell centring; other absences give glide planes and screw
axes; centric or acentric statistics indicate the presence
or absence of inversion centres.
a) Monoclinic. Conditions for observed reflections:
hkl, none; h0l, h+l even; h00, h even; 0k0, k even; 00l,
l even. Centric distribution for general reflections.
Monoclinic, P; h0l absences show n glide plane per-
pendicular to b and include h00 and 00l;0k0 shows 2
1
parallel to b. This uniquely identifies P2
1
/n (alterna-
tive setting of P2
1
/c with different choice of a,c axes),
which is centrosymmetric in accord with statistics.
b) Orthorhombic. Conditionsfor observedreflections:
hkl, all odd or all even; 0kl, k + l = 4n and both k
and l even; h0l, h + l = 4n and both h and l even;
hk0, h + k = 4n and both h and k even; h00, h = 4n,
0k0, k = 4n ;00l, l = 4 n. Centric distribution for
general reflections.
Orthorhombic F (this condition can be expressed in
equivalent terms as: h + k, k + l, h + l all even, and
it includes all the all-even index observations for
reflectionswith one index zero); the various 4n obser-
vations for relections with one index equal to zero
show d glide planes perpendicular to all three cell
axes, and these include all the axial reflection condi-
tions (so no deduction of four-fold screw axes!). This
uniquely identifies Fddd,
which is centrosymmetric.
c)
Orthorhombic.Conditions forobserved reflections:
hkl, none; 0kl, k + l even; h0l, h even; hk0, none; h00,
h even; 0k0, k even; 00l, l even. Acentric distribution
for general reflections, centric for hk0.
Orthorhombic P;0kl absences show n glide perpen-
dicularto a-axis; h0l absences show a glideperpendic-
ular to b-axis; no glide plane perpendicular to c-axis
and absences say nothing about mirror planes; all
axial absences are contained within the glide plane
conditions, so prove nothing. Acentric distribution
indicates no inversion symmetry, so there can not be
a mirrorplane perpendicular to c (this would give the
centrosymmetric point group mmm and space group
Pnam, an alternative setting of the conventional Pnma
with a change of axes). Point group must be mm2,
with either 2 or 2
1
parallel to c-axis. In fact it is 2
1
and the space group is Pna2
1
(there is no Pna2, this is
an impossible combination of symmetry elements).
d) Tetragonal. Reflections hkl and khl have the same
intensity. Conditions for observed reflections: hkl,
none; 0kl, none; h0l, none; hk0, none; h00, h even;
0k0, k even; 00l, l = 4n; hh0, none. Acentric distribu-
tion for general reflections; centric for 0kl, h0l, hk0,
and hhl subsets of data.
Tetragonal P; the equivalence of hkl and khl shows
mirror symmetry in the ab diagonal for the Laue
group, which is 4/mmm rather than 4/m; there are no
glide planes, from reflections with one zero index; 00l
absences show either 4
1
or 4
3
along c-axis; h00 and
0k0 show 2
1
parallel to both a and b (which are equiv-
alent in tetragonal symmetry); no absences for hh0,
so no 2
1
in the ab diagonal direction. Space group
is either P4
1
2
1
2orP4
3
2
1
2; these are an enantiomor-
phous pair, and are non-centrosymmetric.
Chapter 5
1. State which of the following represent real-space or
reciprocal-space quantities:
a) the structure factor, F;
Reciprocal.
b) a space in which Miller indices, h, k, l are
labelled;
Reciprocal.
c) the measured intensity of a diffraction spot;
Real.
d) unit cell parameters, a, b, c, α, β, γ ;
Real.
e) the representation of a part of a crystal structure
via a 2D diffraction pattern;
Reciprocal.
f) diffractometer axes, x, y, z;
Real.
2. Below are the crystal data for a given compound.
Crystal data for C
26
H
40
N
2
Mo, M
r
= 476.54, orange
spherical crystal (0.4 mm diameter), monoclinic,
space group C2/c, a = 20.240(2), b = 6.550(1), c =
19.910(4) Å, β = 90.101(3)
◦
, V = 2640.4(3) Å
3
, T =
150 K. 2253 unique reflections were measured on
a Bruker CCD area diffractometer, using graphite-
monochromated Mo K
α
radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å).
Lorentz and polarization corrections were applied.
Absorption corrections were made by Gaussian
integration using the calculated attenuation coef-
ficient, μ = 0.44 mm
−1
. The structure was solved
using direct methods and refined by full-matrix
least-squares refinement using SHELXL97 with
2253 unique reflections. During the refinement, an
extinction correction was applied. Refinement of