
134 • Trig Limits and Derivatives
7.1.3 The large case
Consider the limit
lim
x→∞
sin(x)
x
.
As we just saw, if x → 0 instead of ∞, then the limit is 1. This is because
sin(x) behaves like x when x is small. How does sin(x) behave when x gets
larger and larger? It just keeps on oscillating between −1 and 1. So it doesn’t
really “behave” like anything when x is large. Often one is forced to resort to
one of the simplest things you can say about sin(x) (and also cos(x)):
−1 ≤ sin(x) ≤ 1 and −1 ≤ cos(x) ≤ 1 for any x.
This is pretty darn handy for applying the sandwich principle (see Section 3.6
in Chapter 3). In fact, we saw on page 53 that
lim
x→∞
sin(x)
x
= 0.
Take a look back at the proof right now to refresh your memory.
Remember how cos(x) is the odd one out when x is small? Unlike sin(x)
and tan(x), it doesn’t behave like x itself. When x is large, on the other hand,
tan(x) is the odd one out. There are no inequalities for tan(x) similar to the
boxed inequalities for sin(x) and cos(x) above; this is because tan(x) keeps
on having vertical asymptotes and never settles down when x becomes large
(see page 37 for the graph of y = tan(x)).
Here’s a much harder example using the sandwich principle: find
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(t, f(t))
(u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(x, f(x))
y = |x|
(z, f(z))
z
y = f(x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −1
u
v
uv
u + ∆u
v + ∆v
(u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆u
∆v
u∆v
v∆u
∆u∆v
y = f(x)
1
2
−2
y = |x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
lim
x→∞
x sin(11x
7
) −
1
2
2x
4
.
The gut feeling is that the sin(11x
7
) term isn’t doing much, so the top is really
of size about x. The x
4
on the bottom should overwhelm the numerator, so
the whole thing should go to 0 as x → ∞. In order to show this, let’s look at
the numerator first. We know that the sine of any number is between −1 and
1, so it’s true that
−1 ≤ sin(11x
7
) ≤ 1.
The numerator isn’t just sin(11x
7
), though: we need to multiply by x and
then subtract 1/2. We can in fact multiply by x and then subtract 1/2 from
all three “sides” of the above inequality to get
−x −
1
2
≤ x sin(11x
7
) −
1
2
≤ x −
1
2
for any x > 0. (If instead x < 0, which would be the case if the limit were as
x → −∞, then multiplying by the negative number x would just mean that
you’d have to flip those less-than-or-equal signs around to become greater-
than-or-equal signs. Otherwise the solution would be identical.) Anyway,
that takes care of the numerator. We still need to divide by the denominator.
Since 2x
4
> 0, we can divide the above inequality by 2x
4
to get
−x −
1
2
2x
4
≤
x sin(11x
7
) −
1
2
2x
4
≤
x −
1
2
2x
4
.