240 THE GOIDELIC LANGUAGES
Notes on the obstruent system
Status of /j/. /j/ attains phonemic status through bi- segmental treatment of i before certain
non- palatalized cononants and groups (e.g., ionnsaich //iNsəx´// as /juNsəx´/ or /jũːsəx´/)
and through weakening of //ɣ´// (e.g., taigh //taɣ´// giving /təj/).
Status of //p´ b´ f´ v´//. For present purposes the Common Gaelic palatalized labials may
be said to have developed as follows: where P = a labial consonant, initially //P´// gives
/P/ before remaining front vowels, e.g., beud ‘harm’ = //b´e:d// = /beːd/), but otherwise
/Pj/ (sometimes realized as /P/ + a semi- vocalic glide or vowel), e.g., beàrn ‘gap’ //b´eRN//
yields /bjaːRN/ (sometimes [b
ε8
aːRN] or [bεaRN]). Closing stressed syllables //P´// has given
/jP/ > /iP/, or /P/ with compensatory vowel change, e.g., lùib ‘(of a) bend’ /Luib/, dhàibh
‘to them’ /ɣaiv/; cnàimh ‘bone’ /krãĩv/ or /krε)ːv/, cnaip ‘(of a) lump’ /krε)(h)p/. Internally
and closing unstressed syllables /P´/ gave /P/, often with compensatory vowel affection,
but occasionally /jP/ > /iP/, e.g., caibe ‘spade’ /kεbə/, Raibeart (earlier Roibeart) ‘Robert’
/RεbəRt/; exceptionally suipeir ‘supper’ /suipar´/ (realized with [ɯçp], i.e., with devoicing
of /j/ before /p/). For articulatory distinction (specifi ed in terms of lip tension) of the labials
in contact with front vowels in stressed syllables see Borgstrøm 1940: 18–19 and MacAulay
1966. For discussion of the phonemic status and realization of the glides see Ternes 2006:
27–43.
Status of //h´//. A development comparable to that of the labials has taken place, result-
ing in either loss of palatalization or bi- segmental realization as /hj/ or /h/ + vocalic
glide or vowel; for example, na h- eòin /nə 'hjɔːN´/ ‘the birds’ appears as [nə 'hjɔːN´], [nə
'h
ε8
ɔːN´] or [nə 'hεɔN´].
Status of pre- aspiration. The Scottish Gaelic dialects show two sorts of realization of
the sequences //Vp Vt Vk// in stressed syllables, one being symmetrical (i.e., [p t k], [
h
p
h
t
h
k] or [xp xt xk]) and the other asymmetrical (i.e. [p t xk] or [hp, ht, xk]). Of these
the ‘standard’ treatment for our purposes is the last, including as it does the Hebrides
other than Lewis (which has [
h
p,
h
t,
h
k]). These sequences are here assigned the phonemic
values /hp, ht, xk/, though it is clear that a monophonemic interpretation could be sus-
tained, for example, in the case of Lewis. For discussion see Ternes 2006: 44–54.
Status of glottalization. The glottal stop [ʔ] is generally regarded as a southerly feature
in Scottish Gaelic, but in fact extends well into the central area. It occurs in two princi-
pal environments: (a) intervocally in hiatus words, e.g., ogha [oʔə] ‘grandson’, tughadh
[tuʔəɣ] ‘thatch’; (b) pre- consonantally where a member of the lenis series of consonants
follows a short vowel, e.g., uile [uʔlə] ‘all’. (The latter type occurs only in a restricted way
outside the southerly ‘homeland’ of glottalization.) Perhaps [ʔ] should be regarded as an
allophone of a hiatus phoneme or prosodeme; it certainly needs refi nement in terms of the
type of glottal feature involved. See Shuken 1984, Dilworth 1995–6, Watson 1996, Ternes
2006: 129–45, Jones 2006.
The articulation of the voiced fricatives /ɣ/, /v/, etc., is noticeably more lax in non-
initial positions, leading in some dialects/positions to vocalization or loss: hence their
specifi cation as [W], [G] and [J] above. Compare the examples slànaighear (with /əɣ´ə/
> /əjə/ > /iə/) and britheamhan (with /əvə/ > /əwə/ > /uə/) cited above, and see further
below, ‘Consonant clusters’.
For details of consonantal realization beyond the skeleton account given above, ‘Scot-
tish Gaelic orthography and pronunciation’, see the dialect monographs of Borgstrøm,
Oftedal and Ternes cited in the References.