0.711 0.028 67 63 62 85 … 76
(a)
(a)
20 … …
4
0.762 0.030 60 58 57 77 71 68
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
0.813 0.032
(a)
51 52 69 62 59
(a)
(a)
(a)
… …
…
0.864 0.034
(a)
43 45 … 52 50
(a)
(a)
(a)
… …
…
0.889 0.035 … … …
(a)
… …
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
0.914 0.036
(a)
(a)
37 … 40 42
(a)
(a)
(a)
… …
…
0.965 0.038
(a)
(a)
28 … 28 31
(a)
(a)
(a)
… …
…
1.016 0.040
(a)
(a)
20
(a)
… 22
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
Note: These values are approximate only and are intended primarily as a guide; see text for example of use.
Material thinner than shown should be tested with a microhardness tester. The thickness of the workpiece
should be at least 1.5 times the diagonal of the indentation when using a Vickers indenter, and at least one-half
times the long diagonal when using a Knoop indenter.
(a) No minimum hardness for metal of equal or greater thickness.
Consider a requirement to check the hardness of a strip of steel 0.36 mm (0.014 in.) thick with an approximate
hardness of 63 HRC. According to the established minimum thickness values, material in the 63 HRC range
must be approximately 0.71 mm (0.028 in.) thick for an accurate Rockwell C scale test. Therefore, 63 HRC
must be converted to an approximate equivalent hardness on other Rockwell scales. These values, taken from a
conversion table, are 73 HRD, 82.8 HRA, 69.9 HR45N, 80.1 HR30N, and 91.4 HR15N. Hardness conversion
tables are provided in the article “Hardness Conversions for Steels” in this Volume.
Referring to Table 4, there are only three appropriate Rockwell scales—45N, 30N, and 15N—for hardened
0.356 mm (0.014 in.) thick material. The 45N scale is not suitable because the material should be at least 74
HR45N. The 30N scale requires the material to be at least 80 HR30N; on the 15N scale, the material must be at
least 76 HR15N. Therefore, either the 30N or 15N scale can be used.
If a choice remains after all criteria have been applied, then the scale applying the heavier load should be used.
A heavier load produces a larger indentation covering a greater portion of the material, as well as a Rockwell
hardness number more representative of the material as a whole. In addition, the heavier the load, the greater
the sensitivity of the scale.
In the example under consideration, a conversion chart will indicate that, in the hard steel range, a difference in
hardness of one point on the Rockwell 30N scale represents a difference of only 0.5 points on the Rockwell
15N scale. Therefore, smaller differences in hardness can be detected when using the 30N scale. This approach
also applies when selecting a scale to accurately measure hardness when approximate case depth and hardness
are known.
Minimum thickness charts and the 10-to-1 ratio serve only as guides. After determining which Rockwell scale
should be used based on minimum thickness values, an actual test should be performed, and the side directly
beneath the indentation should be examined to determine whether the material was disturbed or a bulge exists.
If so, the material is not sufficiently thick for the applied load. This results in a condition known as “anvil
effect.” When anvil effect or flow exists, the Rockwell hardness number obtained may not be a true value. The
Rockwell scale applying the next lighter load should then be used.
Use of several specimens, one on top of the other, is not allowed. Slippage between the contact surfaces of the
specimens makes a true value impossible to obtain. The only exception is in the testing of plastics; use of
several thicknesses for elastomeric materials when anvil effect is present is recommended in ASTM D 785,
“Standard Test Method for Rockwell Hardness of Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials.” Testing
performed on soft plastics may not have an adverse effect when the test specimen is composed of a stack of
several pieces of the same thickness, provided that the surfaces of the pieces are in total contact and not held
apart by sink marks, buffs from saw cuts, or other protrusions.
When testing specimens for which the anvil effect results, the condition of the supporting surface of the anvil
must be observed carefully. After several tests, this surface may become marred, or a small indentation may be
produced. Either condition affects the Rockwell test, because under the major load the test material will sink
into the indentation in the anvil and a lower reading will result. If a specimen is found to have been too thin
during testing, the anvil surface should be inspected; if damaged, it should be relapped or replaced.
When using a ball indenter and a superficial scale load of 15 kgf on a specimen in which anvil effect or material
flow is present, a diamond spot anvil can be used in place of the standard steel anvil. Under these conditions,
the hard diamond surface is not likely to be damaged when testing thin materials. Furthermore, with materials